A diffusion model analysis of sustained attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE Whether children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have deficits in sustained attention remains unresolved due to the ongoing use of cognitive paradigms that are not optimized for studying vigilance and the fact that relatively few studies report performance over time. METHOD In three independent samples of school-age children with (total N = 128) and without ADHD (total N = 59), we manipulated event rate, difficulty of discrimination, and use signal detection (SDT) and diffusion models (DM) to evaluate the cause of the vigilance decrement during a continuous performance task. RESULTS For both groups of children, a bias toward "no-go" over time (as indexed by the SDT parameter B″ and the DM parameter z/a) was responsible for generating the vigilance decrement. However, among children with ADHD, the rate at which information accumulated to make a no-go decision (vNoGo) also increased with time on task, representing a possible secondary mechanism that biases children against engagement. At all time points, children with ADHD demonstrated reduced sensitivity to discriminate targets from nontargets. CONCLUSION Children with ADHD are particularly sensitive to the cost of task engagement, but nonspecific slower drift rate may ultimately provide a better conceptualization of the cognitive atypicalities commonly observed in that group. Results are interpreted in the context of updated conceptualizations of sustained attention and vigilance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  When the Muses Strike: Creative Ideas of Physicists and Writers Routinely Occur During Mind Wandering , 2019, Psychological science.

[2]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Boring Thoughts and Bored Minds: The MAC Model of Boredom and Cognitive Engagement , 2018, Psychological review.

[3]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Testing Formal Predictions of Neuroscientific Theories of ADHD With a Cognitive Model–Based Approach , 2018, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  N. Chevalier Willing to Think Hard? The Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in Children. , 2018, Child development.

[5]  M. Wardle,et al.  The Cognitive Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (C-EEfRT): A Novel Measure of Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort , 2018, Psychological assessment.

[6]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Automatic Control: How Experts Act Without Thinking , 2018, Psychological review.

[7]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model , 2018, Decision.

[8]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Non‐normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? , 2017, Psicothema.

[9]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  The Role of Speed in ADHD-Related Working Memory Deficits , 2017, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[10]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Using the Diffusion Model to Explain Cognitive Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2017, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[11]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Philippe Lacherez,et al.  When and Why Threats Go Undetected , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Evaluating the consequences of impaired monitoring of learned behavior in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a Bayesian hierarchical model of choice response time. , 2016, Neuropsychology.

[14]  Derek Besner,et al.  A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks. , 2015, Psychological review.

[15]  J. Wixted,et al.  Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases , 2015, Perception.

[16]  T. Braver,et al.  Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  F. Verbruggen,et al.  Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Computational and Neural Basis of Cognitive Control: Charted Territory and New Frontiers , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  C. White,et al.  Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.

[22]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  If You Don’t Find It Often, You Often Don’t Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer Screening , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  P. Hancock,et al.  In search of vigilance: the problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. , 2013, The American psychologist.

[25]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  Integrating Impairments in Reaction Time and Executive Function Using a Diffusion Model Framework , 2013, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[26]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[27]  J. Nigg,et al.  Decomposing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related effects in response speed and variability. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[28]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: a meta-analysis of CPT performance. , 2012, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Bias in the Brain: A Diffusion Model Analysis of Prior Probability and Potential Payoff , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Children are not like older adults: a diffusion model analysis of developmental changes in speeded responses. , 2012, Child development.

[31]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[32]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[34]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  Working memory demands impair skill acquisition in children with ADHD. , 2010, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[37]  Cecil R. Reynolds,et al.  Behavior Assessment System for Children , 2010 .

[38]  J. Swanson,et al.  Evaluating dopamine reward pathway in ADHD: clinical implications. , 2009, JAMA.

[39]  K. Lange,et al.  Vigilance and Sustained Attention in Children and Adults With ADHD , 2009, Journal of attention disorders.

[40]  Diederick E. Grobbee,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research , 2008 .

[41]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[42]  R. Tannock,et al.  The Effects of Incentives on Visual–Spatial Working Memory in Children with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2008, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[43]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model explanation of the worst performance rule for reaction time and IQ. , 2008, Intelligence.

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  M. Gill,et al.  The Cognitive Genetics of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Sustained attention as a Candidate Phenotype , 2006, Cortex.

[47]  W. Gehring,et al.  More attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort , 2006, Brain Research Reviews.

[48]  Danielle N. Pappas ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation , 2006 .

[49]  Jaap Oosterlaan,et al.  The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: a review and theoretical appraisal. , 2005, Clinical psychology review.

[50]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  C. Reynolds,et al.  The continuous performance test: a window on the neural substrates for attention? , 2002, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[52]  M. Sarter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[53]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[54]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  Effects of Signal Probability on Individual Differences in Vigilance , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[55]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[57]  C. Conners Conners' rating scales-revised : technical manual , 1997 .

[58]  M. Dulcan,et al.  Representativeness of clinical samples of youths with mental disorders: a preliminary population-based study. , 1997, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  R. Klein,et al.  Error patterns on the continuous performance test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: a meta-analytic review. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[60]  J. Biederman,et al.  DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. , 1994, The American journal of psychiatry.

[61]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Skill development in vigilance: effects of event rate and age. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[62]  M. Verbaten,et al.  Processing Demands, Effort, and Individual Differences in Four Different Vigilance Tasks , 1989, Human factors.

[63]  R. Ratcliff Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[64]  P. Cohen,et al.  The clinician's illusion. , 1984, Archives of general psychiatry.

[65]  R. Parasuraman Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. , 1979, Science.

[66]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[67]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  A Taxonomic Analysis of Vigilance Performance , 1977 .

[68]  N. Mackworth The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged Visual Search 1 , 1948 .

[69]  J BERKSON,et al.  Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. , 1946, Biometrics.