Digital imaging of bone and tooth modification

Digital cameras are capable of producing images of cut marks and other three dimensional subjects comparable to those obtained from the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Until now, the SEM has offered unparalleled depth of field and surface rendition. SEM units are, however, expensive to acquire and maintain, and SEM image production is time‐intensive. Furthermore, SEM images lack color and are often incapable of imaging bone modifications because of magnification and chamber size limitations. A digital imaging method for producing extremely high depth of field enlargements of three dimensional, sub‐millimeter scale objects circumvents these problems. In our presentation we employ four case studies of hard tissue modification related to: (1) the origins of meat‐eating in the human lineage; (2) evidence for cannibalistic behavior among Neanderthals; (3) pre‐Columbian evidence of North American dentistry; and (4) the earliest evidence of cranial surgery in North America. Procedures for replica production, image‐capture, and image enhancement are provided. The digital images produced are compared to those obtained with the SEM. Image processing software, a crucial component of this method, allows complete control of graphic data, making graphic fraud a larger threat than ever before. Issues in ethics stemming from the application of this technology to scientific analysis are considered. Anat Rec (New Anat) 261:237–246, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M H Paalman Scientific misconduct: The ultimate negative career move , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[2]  E M During,et al.  Mechanical surface analysis of bone: a case study of cut marks and enamel hypoplasia on a Neolithic cranium from Sweden. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  P. Shipman Applications of Scanning Electron Microscopy to Taphonomic Problems * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  C. Marean,et al.  Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces , 1996 .

[5]  E. Vrba,et al.  Environment and behavior of 2.5-million-year-old Bouri hominids. , 1999, Science.

[6]  T. Bromage The scanning electron microscopy/replica technique and recent applications to the study of fossil bone. , 1987, Scanning microscopy.

[7]  J. Guilday,et al.  Aboriginal butchering techniques at the Escheiman Site (36 La 12), Lancaster County, Pennsylvania , 1962 .

[8]  T. White,et al.  Neanderthal cannibalism at Moula-Guercy, Ardèche, France. , 1999, Science.

[9]  Henry T. Bunn,et al.  Archaeological evidence for meat-eating by Plio-Pleistocene hominids from Koobi Fora and Olduvai Gorge , 1981, Nature.

[10]  E. P. Barbour A study of the structure of fresh and fossil human bone by means of the electron microscope. , 1950, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  Brief communication: cutmarks on a plio-pleistocene hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  L. Pouyaud,et al.  Une nouvelle espèce de cœlacanthe. Preuves génétiques et morphologiques , 1999 .

[13]  T. White,et al.  Brief communication: prehistoric dentistry in the American southwest: a drilled canine from Sky Aerie, Colorado. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  Kwok Y. Wong,et al.  Four-million-pixel CCD image sensor , 1990, Other Conferences.

[15]  L. Binford Human ancestors: Changing views of their behavior , 1985 .

[16]  J. Bancroft,et al.  Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques , 1990 .

[17]  R. Lyman 5 – Archaeofaunas and Butchery Studies: A Taphonomic Perspective , 1987 .

[18]  H. McCabe,et al.  Tangled tale of a lost, stolen and disputed coelacanth , 2000, Nature.

[19]  C. Schmidt Methods for Casting Ancient Bone and Teeth for Viewing under the SEM , 1999, Microscopy Today.

[20]  H. McCabe Recriminations and confusion over ‘fake’ coelacanth photo , 2000, Nature.

[21]  T. White Prehistoric cannibalism at Mancos 5MTUMR-2346 , 1993 .

[22]  R. Caldwell,et al.  Indonesian ‘king of the sea’ discovered , 1998, Nature.

[23]  H. Thieme Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany , 1997, Nature.

[24]  M. E. Lartet On the Coexistence of Man with certain Extinct Quadrupeds, proved by Fossil Bones, from various Pleistocene Deposits, bearing Incisions made by sharp Instruments , 1860, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.

[25]  R. L. Hay,et al.  Pliocene footprints in the Laetolil Beds at Laetoli, northern Tanzania , 1979, Nature.

[26]  B. C. Burkey,et al.  A four million pixel CCD image sensor , 1990, ESSDERC '90: 20th European Solid State Device Research Conference.

[27]  P. Shipman,et al.  Early hominid hunting, butchering, and carcass-processing behaviors: Approaches to the fossil record , 1983 .

[28]  R. Potts,et al.  Cutmarks made by stone tools on bones from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania , 1981, Nature.

[29]  G. E. Smith,et al.  Charge coupled semiconductor devices , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[30]  P. Shipman,et al.  Evidence of butchery and hominid activities at Torralba and Ambrona; an evaluation using microscopic techniques , 1983 .

[31]  B. Latimer,et al.  Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. , 1999, Science.

[32]  G. D. Richards,et al.  Earliest cranial surgery in North America , 1995 .

[33]  J. J. Rose A replication technique for scanning electron microscopy: Applications for anthropologists , 1983 .