Optimal investment with counterparty risk: a default-density model approach

We consider a financial market with a stock exposed to a counterparty risk inducing a jump in the price, and which can still be traded after this default time. The jump represents a loss or gain of the asset value at the default of the counterparty. We use a default-density modelling approach, and address in this incomplete market context the problem of expected utility maximization from terminal wealth. We show how this problem can be suitably decomposed in two optimization problems in a default-free framework: an after-default utility maximization and a global before-default optimization problem involving the former one. These two optimization problems are solved explicitly, respectively, by duality and dynamic programming approaches, and provide a detailed description of the optimal strategy. We give some numerical results illustrating the impact of counterparty risk and the loss or gain given default on optimal trading strategies, in particular with respect to the Merton portfolio selection problem. For example, this explains how an investor can take advantage of a large loss of the asset value at default in extreme situations as observed during the financial crisis.

[1]  W. Schachermayer,et al.  The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets , 1999 .

[2]  M. Yor,et al.  Grossissements de filtrations: exemples et applications , 1985 .

[3]  Julien Hugonnier,et al.  Pricing and hedging in the presence of extraneous risks , 2007 .

[4]  J. Jacod,et al.  Grossissement initial, hypothese (H′) et theoreme de Girsanov , 1985 .

[5]  N. Karoui,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Pricing of Contingent Claims in an Incomplete Market , 1995 .

[6]  M. Morlais Utility maximization in a jump market model , 2006, math/0612181.

[7]  N. Karoui Les Aspects Probabilistes Du Controle Stochastique , 1981 .

[8]  N. Karoui,et al.  Optimal investment decisions when time-horizon is uncertain , 2008 .

[9]  Monique Jeanblanc,et al.  What happens after a default: The conditional density approach , 2009, 0905.0559.

[10]  T. Bielecki,et al.  Credit Risk: Modeling, Valuation And Hedging , 2004 .

[11]  Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet,et al.  CREDIT RISK PREMIA AND QUADRATIC BSDEs WITH A SINGLE JUMP , 2009, 0907.1221.

[12]  Utility Maximization in a Jump Market Model 1 , 2008 .

[13]  Huyên Pham,et al.  Wealth-path dependent utility maximization in incomplete markets , 2004, Finance Stochastics.

[14]  Roger Mansuy,et al.  Random Times and Enlargements of Filtrations in a Brownian Setting , 2006 .

[15]  Daniel H. Wagner Survey of measurable selection theorems: An update , 1980 .

[16]  Agostino Capponi,et al.  Bilateral Counterparty Risk Valuation with Stochastic Dynamical Models and Application to Credit Default Swaps , 2008, 0812.3705.

[17]  R. Jarrow,et al.  Counterparty Risk and the Pricing of Defaultable Securities , 1999 .

[18]  T. Jeulin Semi-Martingales et Grossissement d’une Filtration , 1980 .

[19]  Thomas Lim,et al.  Utility maximization in incomplete markets with default , 2008 .

[20]  Monique Jeanblanc,et al.  Progressive enlargement of filtration with initial times , 2007 .

[21]  Ronnie Sircar,et al.  Utility valuation of multi-name credit derivatives and application to CDOs , 2010 .

[22]  Monique Jeanblanc,et al.  Progressive Enlargement of Filtrations with Initial Times , 2008 .