Deflection Routing for Optical Bursts Considering Possibility of Contention at Downstream Nodes

Deflection routing is one of the promising approaches to resolve contention in the optical burst switching networks. In the conventional deflection routing scheme, optical bursts may be unable to traverse the route evaluated to select an outgoing link because of the contention at succeeding downstream transit nodes. As a result, the optical bursts may traverse a different route resulting in a long distance or decreased performance. This paper proposes a deflection routing scheme that considers the possibility of the contention at downstream nodes. This scheme utilizes the expected route distance instead of the static route distance toward a destination node. The expected route distance considers the possibility of contention at each downstream transit node and is calculated using measured link blocking probabilities at each downstream transit node. The selection priority of each outgoing link is given dynamically based on its expected route distance toward a destination node. By considering the possibility of contention at downstream nodes, a routing scheme with high performance can be realized. The loss rate of optical bursts is improved when an imbalanced load is applied to the network, and the loss rate of optical bursts is also improved when the network includes links with extremely different distances.

[1]  Vinod Vokkarane,et al.  Dynamic congestion-based load balanced routing in optical burst-switched networks , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[2]  Xi Wang,et al.  Burst optical deflection routing protocol for wavelength routing WDM networks , 2000, Other Conferences.

[3]  J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.  Distributed routing with labeled distances , 1992, [Proceedings] IEEE INFOCOM '92: The Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  SuKyoung Lee,et al.  Contention-based limited deflection routing in OBS networks , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[5]  Gary Scott Malkin,et al.  RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information , 1993, RFC.

[6]  Nen-Fu Huang,et al.  Performance analysis of deflection routing in optical burst-switched networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[7]  A. K. Choudhury,et al.  An Approximate Analysis of the Performance of Deflection Routing in Regular Networks , 1993, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  John Y. Wei,et al.  Just-in-time Optical Burst Switching for Multiwavelength Networks , 1999, Broadband Communications.

[9]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Advances in photonic packet switching: an overview , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Design of Logical Topologies for Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[11]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  All-optical packet-switched networks: a study of contention-resolution schemes in an irregular mesh network with variable-sized packets , 2000, Other Conferences.

[12]  A. Bononi,et al.  Analysis of hot-potato optical networks with wavelength conversion , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).

[13]  QiaoChunming,et al.  Optical burst switching (OBS) - a new paradigm for an optical Internet , 1999 .

[14]  Sungchang Kim,et al.  Contention resolution for optical burst switching networks using alternative routing , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).