An experimental switchable stiffness device for shock isolation

The development of an experimental switching stiffness device for shock isolation is presented. The system uses magnetic forces to exert a restoring force, which results in an effective stiffness that is used to isolate a payload. When the magnetic force is turned on and off, a switchable stiffness is obtained. Characterization of the physical properties of the device is presented. They are estimated in terms of the percentage stiffness change and effective damping ratio when switched between two constant stiffness states. Additionally, the setup is used to implement a control strategy to reduce the shock response and minimize residual vibration. The system was found to be very effective for shock isolation. The response is reduced by around 50 percent compared with passive isolation showing good correlation with theoretical predictions, and the effective damping ratio in the system following the shock was increased from about 4.5 percent to 13 percent.

[1]  Arthur F. Kip,et al.  Fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism , 1962 .

[2]  Richard G. Cobb,et al.  A variable stiffness device selection and design tool for lightly damped structures , 2005 .

[3]  J. Chen,et al.  Response of large space structures with stiffness control , 1984 .

[4]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Shock Performance of Different Semiactive Damping Strategies , 2010 .

[5]  N. Chandra Shekhar,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF NON-LINEAR ISOLATORS AND ABSORBERS TO SHOCK EXCITATIONS , 1999 .

[6]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Shock isolation using an isolator with switchable stiffness , 2011 .

[7]  N. Chandra Shekhar,et al.  RESPONSE OF NON-LINEAR DISSIPATIVE SHOCK ISOLATORS , 1998 .

[8]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Two simple methods to suppress the residual vibrations of a translating or rotating flexible cantilever beam , 2008 .

[9]  Diego Francisco,et al.  Shock isolation using switchable stiffness , 2008 .

[10]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  The Effect of Dual-Rate Suspension Damping on Vehicle Response to Transient Road Inputs , 2009 .

[11]  David G. Jones,et al.  Vibration and Shock in Damped Mechanical Systems , 1968 .

[12]  Giorgio Rizzoni,et al.  Principles and Applications of Electrical Engineering , 1993 .

[13]  Kefu Liu,et al.  A tunable high-static–low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator , 2010 .

[14]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Shock and vibration handbook , 1976 .

[15]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  Optimal Performance of Variable Stiffness Devices for Structural , 2007 .

[16]  J. C. Snowdon.  Response of Nonlinear Shock Mountings to Transient Foundation Displacements , 1961 .

[17]  M. S. Hundal.  Impact absorber with linear spring and quadratic law damper , 1976 .

[18]  Junjiro Onoda,et al.  Vibration Suppression by Variable-Stiffness Members , 1990 .

[19]  J. C. Snowdon.  Transient Response of Nonlinear Isolation Mountings to Pulselike Displacements , 1963 .

[20]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  VIBRATION SUPPRESSION WITH RESETTABLE DEVICE , 2002 .