Neural and Cognitive Underpinnings of Counterintuitive Science and Math Reasoning in Adolescence

Abstract Reasoning about counterintuitive concepts in science and math is thought to require suppressing naive theories, prior knowledge, or misleading perceptual cues through inhibitory control. Neuroimaging research has shown recruitment of pFC regions during counterintuitive reasoning, which has been interpreted as evidence of inhibitory control processes. However, the results are inconsistent across studies and have not been directly compared with behavior or brain activity during inhibitory control tasks. In this fMRI study, 34 adolescents (aged 11–15 years) answered science and math problems and completed response inhibition tasks (simple and complex go/no-go) and an interference control task (numerical Stroop). Increased BOLD signal was observed in parietal (Brodmann's area 40) and prefrontal (Brodmann's area 8, 45/47) cortex regions in counterintuitive problems compared with control problems, where no counterintuitive reasoning was required, and in two parietal clusters when comparing correct counterintuitive reasoning to giving the incorrect intuitive response. There was partial overlap between increases in BOLD signal in the complex response inhibition and interference control tasks and the science and math contrasts. However, multivariate analyses suggested overlapping neural substrates in the parietal cortex only, in regions typically associated with working memory and visuospatial attentional demands rather than specific to inhibitory control. These results highlight the importance of using localizer tasks and a range of analytic approach to investigate to what extent common neural networks underlie performance of different cognitive tasks and suggests visuospatial attentional skills may support counterintuitive reasoning in science and math.

[1]  Martin Riopel,et al.  An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science , 2021, NPJ science of learning.

[2]  P. Hotez.  Anti-science kills: From Soviet embrace of pseudoscience to accelerated attacks on US biomedicine , 2021, PLoS biology.

[3]  Steve Masson,et al.  Coexistence of Misconceptions and Scientific Conceptions in Chemistry Professors: A Mental Chronometry and fMRI Study , 2020, Frontiers in Education.

[4]  L. Mason,et al.  Inhibition and Conceptual Learning in Science: a Review of Studies , 2020 .

[5]  Panayiota Kendeou,et al.  Reducing interference from misconceptions: The role of inhibition in knowledge revision. , 2020 .

[6]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Domain-Specific Inhibitory Control Training to Improve Children’s Learning of Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.

[7]  K. Koschutnig,et al.  Individual differences in science competence among students are associated with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation , 2019, Journal of neuroscience research.

[8]  D. Mareschal,et al.  The Unique Contributions of Verbal Analogical Reasoning and Nonverbal Matrix Reasoning to Science and Maths Problem‐Solving in Adolescence , 2019, Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society.

[9]  Ling Li,et al.  A coordinate-based meta-analysis of the n-back working memory paradigm using activation likelihood estimation , 2019, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  David Spiegelhalter,et al.  The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data , 2019 .

[11]  E. Meaburn,et al.  The specificity of associations between cognition and attainment in English, maths and science during adolescence , 2019, Learning and Individual Differences.

[12]  Corson N. Areshenkoff,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions: A Systematic Review and Re-Analysis of Latent Variable Studies , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Neural Correlates Associated With Novices Correcting Errors in Electricity and Mechanics , 2018, Mind, Brain, and Education.

[14]  B. Taylor,et al.  Logarithmic scales in ecological data presentation may cause misinterpretation , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[15]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Inhibitory control and counterintuitive science and maths reasoning in adolescence , 2018, PloS one.

[16]  Patrice Potvin,et al.  Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers , 2017 .

[17]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies , 2017, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Hannah E. Roome,et al.  Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement , 2017, Cognition.

[19]  A. Miyake,et al.  Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure , 2017, Cortex.

[20]  Thomas A. Daniel,et al.  Delayed match-to-sample in working memory: A BrainMap meta-analysis , 2016, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  The neuroscience of conceptual learning in science and mathematics , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[22]  Daniel J Mitchell,et al.  Task Encoding across the Multiple Demand Cortex Is Consistent with a Frontoparietal and Cingulo-Opercular Dual Networks Distinction , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Development of Risk-Taking, Perspective-Taking, and Inhibitory Control During Adolescence , 2016, Developmental neuropsychology.

[24]  R. Blythe,et al.  Executive functions predict conceptual learning of science. , 2016, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[25]  Ryan Mruczek,et al.  Intraparietal regions play a material general role in working memory: Evidence supporting an internal attentional role , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics? , 2015, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[27]  M. Banich,et al.  Recent advances in understanding neural systems that support inhibitory control , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[28]  Lucy Cragg,et al.  The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic , 2015 .

[29]  Kiat Hui Khng,et al.  The Relationship between Stroop and Stop-Signal Measures of Inhibition in Adolescents: Influences from Variations in Context and Measure Estimation , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Interslice leakage artifact reduction technique for simultaneous multislice acquisitions , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Camilla Gilmore,et al.  Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency , 2014, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[32]  Diane Swick,et al.  Ten years of inhibition revisited , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high‐motion data points , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Differences in Brain Activation between Novices and Experts in Science during a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity. , 2014 .

[35]  R. Blythe,et al.  Evidence for a Role of Executive Functions in Learning Biology , 2014 .

[36]  Steve Masson,et al.  Linking neuroscientific research on decision making to the educational context of novice students assigned to a multiple-choice scientific task involving common misconceptions about electrical circuits , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Evaluation of slice accelerations using multiband echo planar imaging at 3T , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Longitudinal Growth Curves of Brain Function Underlying Inhibitory Control through Adolescence , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Inhibitory Control Is Needed for the Resolution of Arithmetic Word Problems: A Developmental Negative Priming Study. , 2013 .

[40]  O. Houdé,et al.  Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults: a developmental negative priming study. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[41]  Antônio Jaeger.  Inhibitory control and the adolescent brain: a review of fMRI research , 2013 .

[42]  M. Criaud,et al.  Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[43]  E. Crone,et al.  Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions , 2012, Cognition.

[45]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[46]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Brain activity during a visuospatial working memory task predicts arithmetical performance 2 years later. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Stacey L. Sheridan,et al.  Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[48]  A. Leslie,et al.  Inhibitory control interacts with core knowledge in toddlers’ manual search for an occluded object. , 2011, Developmental science.

[49]  L. Clark,et al.  The contribution of executive functioning to academic achievement among male adolescents , 2010, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[50]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies , 2010 .

[51]  J. Duncan.  The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Persistence of the Intuitive Conception of Living Things in Adolescence , 2010 .

[53]  B. Luna,et al.  What has fMRI told us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence? , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[54]  Kiat Hui Khng,et al.  Inhibiting interference from prior knowledge: Arithmetic intrusions in algebra word problem solving , 2009 .

[55]  T. Egner.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  R. Babai,et al.  The Persistence of Solid and Liquid Naive Conceptions: A Reaction Time Study , 2008 .

[57]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[59]  D. Mareschal,et al.  Relations as transformations: Implications for analogical reasoning , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  Julie Ryan,et al.  Children's Mathematics 4-15: Learning from Errors and Misconceptions , 2007 .

[61]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Development of intuitive rules: Evaluating the application of the dual-system framework to understanding children’s intuitive reasoning , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Intuitive interference in quantitative reasoning , 2006, Brain Research.

[64]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  J. Leon-Carrion,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE INHIBITORY COMPONENT OF THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS , 2004, The International journal of neuroscience.

[66]  D. A. Walker,et al.  JMASM9: Converting Kendall’s Tau For Correlational Or Meta-Analytic Analyses , 2003 .

[67]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  The Human Prefrontal and Parietal Association Cortices Are Involved in NO-GO Performances: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[68]  V. Menon,et al.  Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[69]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[71]  Young-Shin Kim,et al.  Effect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activity , 2000 .

[72]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[73]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  LEARNING COUNTER-INTUITIVE SCIENCE CONCEPTS: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM OVER A DECADE OF RESEARCH? , 2000 .

[74]  Jon D. Miller.  The measurement of civic scientific literacy , 1998 .

[75]  M. Linn,et al.  Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements , 1994 .

[76]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[77]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[78]  Laura E. Engelhardt,et al.  Developmental transformations in the structure of executive functions. , 2019, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[79]  M. Simon,et al.  Barriers to prevention: knowledge of HPV, cervical cancer, and HPV vaccinations among African American women. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[80]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[81]  Susan Carey,et al.  The effect of executive function on biological reasoning in young children: an individual differences study. , 2014, Child development.

[82]  David M Cutler,et al.  Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. , 2010, Journal of health economics.

[83]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[84]  D. Willingham.  Is It True That Some People Just Can't Do Math? , 2010 .

[85]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Do Naïve Theories Ever Go Away? Using Brain and Behavior to Understand Changes in Concepts , 2007 .

[86]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning , 2000 .

[87]  Yong-Ju Kwon,et al.  Linking Brain Growth with the Development of Scientific Reasoning Ability and Conceptual Change during Adolescence , 2000 .

[88]  J. Nigg.  On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[89]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[90]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Lay Understanding of Science: Young People and Adults' Ideas of Scientific Concepts , 1992 .

[91]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Source (or Part of the following Source): Type Article Title Age-related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis Author(s) Age-related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis , 2022 .

[92]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  A Unified Framework for Inhibitory Control Opinion , 2022 .

[93]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Arithmetic and the Brain This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited the Intraparietal Sulcus and Number Sense Number Sense in the Animal Brain , 2022 .