Exploring the Openness of Cognitive Artifacts in Cooperative Process Management

Abstract: This paper presents a field study at a Stockholm underground control room, with particular focus on the different interactional affordances of the artifacts, used by the operators. The analysis is based on the notion that the design of cognitive artifacts affords different degrees of openness, i.e. to what extent they render the interaction of a task performer with the artifact open to others in the vicinity. A comparison between the dayshift and nightshift demonstrates how the various levels of openness are manifested during work. Some tentative design comments are made with regard to computer support systems for the underground line control.

[1]  James Reason,et al.  Human Error , 1990 .

[2]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Considering an organization's memory , 1998, CSCW '98.

[3]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  C Niessen,et al.  Modelling cognitive processes of experienced air traffic controllers. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[5]  Liat Segal.  Designing team workstations: the choreography of teamwork , 1995 .

[6]  Becky Hill,et al.  A preliminary model of the planning and control of the combined response to disaster , 1996 .

[7]  Debra Cash,et al.  Designing Elfective Systems: A Tool Approach , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[8]  David B. Martin,et al.  The Interactional Affordances of Technology: An Ethnography of Human-Computer Interaction in an Ambulance Control Centre , 1997, BCS HCI.

[9]  Astrid Selling Sjöberg,et al.  Localisation , Orientation and Recognition of Alarms A comparison between three alarm systems in use , 2000 .

[10]  David B. Martin,et al.  Informing collaborative information visualisation through an ethnography of ambulance control , 1999, European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Distributed cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[13]  Christian Heath,et al.  Configuring Action in Objects: From Mutual Space to Media Space , 2000 .

[14]  L. Suchman.  Cognition and communication at work: Constituting shared workspaces , 1996 .

[15]  P. V. H. Weems,et al.  Learning to Navigate , 1943 .

[16]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Ghosts in the network: distributed troubleshooting in a shared working environment , 1992, CSCW '92.

[17]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Design for Unanticipated Use , 1993, ECSCW.

[18]  E. Hutchins.  Understanding practice: Learning to navigate , 1993 .

[19]  Christian Heath,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground , 1996 .

[20]  Richard Harper,et al.  "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting": Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control , 1993 .

[21]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Twinkling Lights and Nested Loops: Distributed Problem Solving and Spreadsheet Development , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  Geneviève Filippi,et al.  Analyzing Cooperative Work in a Urban Traffic Control Room for the Design of a Coordination Support System , 1993, ECSCW.

[23]  Henrik Artman,et al.  Creation and Loss of Cognitive Empathy at an Emergency Control Centre , 1998 .

[24]  Yvonne Waern.  Co-operative process management : cognition and information technology , 1998 .

[25]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes , 1996 .

[26]  I. Joseph,et al.  Attention distribuée et attention focalisée : les protocoles de la coopération au PCC de la ligne A du RER , 1994 .

[27]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.