Moderators of the Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Performance: General Versus Context–Specific Achievement Motivation1

Despite positing a multiplicative model of performance, 3 recent studies failed to find support for a theoretically meaningful interaction between cognitive ability and trait motivation in predicting performance. We suggest that it is important to consider that these studies used trait–motivation constructs that are general in nature, rather than context–specific. Yet, existing theory and research suggests that it may be beneficial to use trait–motivation constructs that are expressly contextual, especially when investigating a multiplicative performance model. This study, therefore, compared general versus context–specific achievement motivation as moderators of the relationship between cognitive ability and performance. The proposition that only context–specific achievement motivation should interact with cognitive ability in predicting performance was supported. Implications are discussed.

[1]  K. M. Kacmar,et al.  P=f(M X A): Cognitive Ability as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Personality and Job Performance , 1995 .

[2]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation , 1996 .

[3]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[4]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[5]  P. Warr.  Indirect processes in criterion-related validity , 2000 .

[6]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[7]  Y Shoda,et al.  Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  W. L. Cron,et al.  The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Ability-personality interactions when predicting job performance , 1998 .

[11]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Working Smarter and Harder: A Longitudinal Study of Managerial Success , 1994 .

[12]  D. Funder.  Global Traits: A Neo-Allportian Approach to Personality , 1991 .

[13]  W. Mischel,et al.  A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  A. Ryan,et al.  Effects of Item Context Specificity on the Measurement Equivalence of a Personality Inventory , 2000 .

[15]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[16]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance : Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits , 1999 .

[17]  H. Moon,et al.  The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Development of a Causal Model of Processes Determining Job Performance , 1992 .

[19]  D. McAdams,et al.  The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[20]  J. Nicholls.  Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. , 1984 .

[21]  Marc Orlitzky,et al.  EXPERIENCED HIRING VERSUS COLLEGE RECRUITING: PRACTICES AND EMERGING TRENDS , 1997 .

[22]  L. Gottfredson,et al.  Validity versus Utility of Mental Tests: Example of the SAT. , 1986 .

[23]  Sarah A. Hezlett,et al.  A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000 .

[25]  R. Sternberg.  The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. , 1997 .

[26]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  The Influence of Goal Orientation and Self-Regulation Tactics on Sales Performance: A Longitudinal Field Test , 1999 .

[27]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. , 1996 .

[28]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Individual differences in work motivation: Further explorations of a trait framework. , 2000 .

[29]  D. McAdams.  What Do We Know When We Know a Person , 1995 .

[30]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The Joint Relationship of Conscientiousness and Ability with Performance: Test of the Interaction Hypothesis , 1999 .

[31]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Interaction in Linear versus Logistic Models: A Substantive Illustration Using the Relationship between Motivation, Ability, and Performance , 2000 .

[32]  M. Schmit,et al.  Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. , 1995 .

[33]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Achievement strivings, scholastic aptitude, and academic performance: a follow-up to "impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern". , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An Empirical Note on the Interaction of Personality and Aptitude in Personnel Selection , 1988 .

[35]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Leaetta M. Hough,et al.  I/Owes its advances to personality. , 2001 .

[37]  W. Mischel.  Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. , 1973, Psychological review.

[38]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[39]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. , 1995 .