Pareto stability in two-sided many-to-many matching with weak preferences
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Shapley,et al. College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 1962 .
[2] Richard M. Karp,et al. Theoretical Improvements in Algorithmic Efficiency for Network Flow Problems , 1972, Combinatorial Optimization.
[3] A. Roth. Stability and Polarization of Interests in Job Matching , 1984 .
[4] Charles Blair,et al. The Lattice Structure of the Set of Stable Matchings with Multiple Partners , 1988, Math. Oper. Res..
[5] Alvin E. Roth,et al. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .
[6] A. Roth,et al. Random paths to stability in two-sided matching , 1990 .
[7] Ronald L. Rivest,et al. Introduction to Algorithms , 1990 .
[8] W A Wulf,et al. The collaboratory opportunity. , 1993, Science.
[9] Robert W. Irving. Stable Marriage and Indifference , 1994, Discret. Appl. Math..
[10] A. Roth,et al. The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design , 1999, The American economic review.
[11] David Manlove,et al. Stable Marriage with Incomplete Lists and Ties , 1999, ICALP.
[12] Michel Balinski,et al. Many-to-many matching: stable polyandrous polygamy (or polygamous polyandry) , 2000, Discret. Appl. Math..
[13] Ahmet Alkan,et al. On preferences over subsets and the lattice structure of stable matchings , 2001 .
[14] David Manlove,et al. Hard variants of stable marriage , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[15] A. Roth. The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics , 2002 .
[16] Ahmet Alkan,et al. A class of multipartner matching markets with a strong lattice structure , 2002 .
[17] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Course Bidding at Business Schools , 2007 .
[18] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .
[19] Jordi Massó,et al. An algorithm to compute the full set of many-to-many stable matchings , 2004, Math. Soc. Sci..
[20] Varun S. Malhotra. On the Stability of Multiple Partner Stable Marriages with Ties , 2004, ESA.
[21] F. Echenique,et al. A Theory of Stability in Many-to-Many Matching Markets , 2004 .
[22] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Credible group stability in many-to-many matching problems , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.
[23] Bettina Klaus,et al. Paths to stability for matching markets with couples , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..
[24] Kurt Mehlhorn,et al. Strongly stable matchings in time O(nm) and extension to the hospitals-residents problem , 2007, TALG.
[25] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Random paths to pairwise stability in many-to-many matching problems: a study on market equilibration , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.
[26] Aytek Erdil,et al. What's the Matter with Tie-Breaking? Improving Efficiency in School Choice , 2008 .
[27] Eric McDermid. A 3/2-Approximation Algorithm for General Stable Marriage , 2009, ICALP.
[28] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match , 2009 .
[29] Ning Chen,et al. Strongly Stable Assignment , 2010, ESA.
[30] Onur Kesten. School Choice with Consent , 2010 .
[31] Eric Budish,et al. The Multi-Unit Assignment Problem: Theory and Evidence from Course Allocation at Harvard , 2010 .
[32] Marilda Sotomayor,et al. The pareto-stability concept is a natural solution concept for discrete matching markets with indifferences , 2011, Int. J. Game Theory.
[33] A. Roth,et al. The Handbook of Market Design , 2013 .
[34] Fuhito Kojima,et al. Efficient resource allocation under multi-unit demand , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..
[35] Naoyuki Kamiyama,et al. A New Approach to the Pareto Stable Matching Problem , 2012, Math. Oper. Res..
[36] F. Klijn,et al. A Many-to-Many 'Rural Hospital Theorem' , 2014 .
[37] Scott Duke Kominers,et al. Matching with Slot-Specific Priorities: Theory , 2016 .
[38] Eduardo M. Azevedo,et al. A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.
[39] David Manlove,et al. Pareto Optimal Matchings in Many-to-Many Markets with Ties , 2015, Theory of Computing Systems.
[40] Aytek Erdil,et al. Two-sided matching with indifferences , 2017, J. Econ. Theory.
[41] Martin Bichler,et al. Matching with indifferences: A comparison of algorithms in the context of course allocation , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[42] Chi-Kit Lam,et al. Group Strategyproof Pareto-Stable Marriage with Indifferences via the Generalized Assignment Game , 2017, SAGT.
[43] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Reserve Design: Unintended Consequences and the Demise of Boston’s Walk Zones , 2018, Journal of Political Economy.
[44] Mengling Li,et al. Ties matter: Improving efficiency in course allocation by allowing ties , 2020, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.