论文信息 - Peer review: the best of the blemished? - 字舞流文

Peer review: the best of the blemished?

Joseph S Alpert | J. Alpert

[1] Richard Smith,et al. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2] F. Godlee. Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit. , 2002, JAMA.

[3] M. Hojat,et al. Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process , 2003, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[4] C. Olson,et al. Peer review of the biomedical literature. , 1990, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5] How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper. , 1999 .

[6] T. Jefferson,et al. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[7] M. Kearney,et al. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process. , 2005, Research in nursing & health.

[8] J. Burnham. The evolution of editorial peer review. , 1990, JAMA.

[9] D. Freshwater. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith. , 2006, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.