Modelling the Factors of Neighbourhood Attractiveness Reflected in Residential Location Decision Choices

Characteristics of neighbourhoods are important in the decisions of people to move. Such characteristics, if collapsed into a small number of components, enable measures of neighbourhood attractiveness to be derived and the patterns mapped in a GIS. This paper employs this procedure for suburbs across the Brisbane-South East Queensland region, the third largest and a rapidly growing metropolis in Australia, using data collected in a survey of quality of life. Three factors of neighbourhood attractiveness—aesthetic, amenity, and social interaction—are identified. To map those factors, a set of surrogate measures that replace survey data derived subjective importance scores with objective measures derived from a series of GIS data overlays are developed. A factor score coefficient matrix is used to derive a set of parameterised linear equations which permits a spatial representation of the factors across the suburbs comprising the Brisbane-SEQ region. This results in a set of maps which display spatial variations in the attractiveness of suburbs vis a vis the derived dimensions of subjective attractiveness for residential selection by people.

[1]  A. Kliskey Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment , 2000 .

[2]  Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: a study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan , 2004 .

[3]  Friedhelm Gehrmann ‘Valid’ empirical measurement of quality of life? , 1978 .

[4]  E. Blakely,et al.  Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States , 1997 .

[5]  D. L. Linton,et al.  The assessment of scenery as a natural resource , 1968 .

[6]  Peter H. Rossi,et al.  Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. , 1956 .

[7]  P. Huxley,et al.  Studies of quality of life in the general population , 2002 .

[8]  Denis F. Johnston,et al.  Toward a comprehensive ‘quality-of-life’ index , 1988 .

[9]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[10]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Travel by design : the influence of urban form on travel , 2001 .

[11]  R. Stimson,et al.  Testing a Moderated Model of Satisfaction with Urban Living using Data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia , 2005 .

[12]  B. Lentnek,et al.  Spatial Mismatch is not Always a Central-city Problem: An Analysis of Commuting Behaviour in Cleveland, Ohio, and its Suburbs , 2001 .

[13]  Mingche M. Li,et al.  Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices , 1980 .

[14]  V. Dokmeci,et al.  Residential-location preferences according to demographic characteristics in Istanbul , 2000 .

[15]  R. Dubin,et al.  Specification of hedonic regressions: Non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality , 1990 .

[16]  M. Horner,et al.  Life Cycle and Environmental Factors in Selecting Residential and Job Locations , 2005 .

[17]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[18]  Geoffrey K. Turnbull,et al.  Recreation Demand and Residential Location , 2002 .

[19]  Peter Fredman,et al.  On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden , 2000 .

[20]  Robert A. Cummins,et al.  Objective and Subjective Auality of Life: an Interactive Model , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis , 2002 .

[22]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Statistical Analysis with ArcView GIS , 2000 .

[23]  Jon Bryan Burley Constructing Interpretable Environments from Multidimensional Data: GIS Suitability Overlays and Principal Component Analysis , 1995 .

[24]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems , 1994 .

[25]  Martin Cadwallader,et al.  Problems in Cognitive Distance , 1979 .

[26]  Robert Rogerson,et al.  Indicators of Quality of Life: Some Methodological Issues , 1989 .

[27]  R. Johnston On the nature of explanation in human geography. , 1980 .

[28]  G. Blomquist,et al.  New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas , 1988 .

[29]  David M. Mark,et al.  Experiential and Formal Models of Geographic Space , 1996 .

[30]  Robert W. Marans,et al.  Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators☆ , 2003 .

[31]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method , 1998 .

[32]  Evan Mckenzie Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government , 1994 .

[33]  Colin Arrowsmith,et al.  Estimating environmental resiliency for the Grampians National Park, Victoria, Australia: a quantitative approach , 2002 .

[34]  David R. Bowes,et al.  Identifying the Impacts of Rail Transit Stations on Residential Property Values , 2001 .

[35]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Rating Places: A Geographer's View on Quality of Life , 1986 .

[36]  L. Anselin,et al.  Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds , 1998 .