Collaborative working to overcome barriers to active transport: learning from a living lab

Innovative research on barriers to active transport in Palmerston North set out to “disrupt” conventional approaches to research in a number of ways. First, council managers and planners worked collaboratively with university researchers to determine the focus of research and the approach that was taken. Second, the two organisations (council and university) chose to focus on their own staff in order to be able to demonstrate leadership in the community in addressing the challenge of promoting active transport. An online questionnaire was developed and administered to staff of both organisations. Third, recognising the need to have a long-term approach, both organisations have continued to collaborate in carrying out follow-up research and implementing the findings. This paper outlines the background to the research that was initiated in 2014 and discusses the importance of the long-term relationships between planners, policy advisors and active transport researchers. It shares insights for local government, district health boards and other key agencies about working collaboratively to co-create research about and implement solutions to increase participation in active transport.

[1]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[2]  R. Ewing,et al.  Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity - update and refinement. , 2014, Health & place.

[3]  R. Carter,et al.  A systematic review of economic analyses of active transport interventions that include physical activity benefits , 2016 .

[4]  John Haymaker,et al.  Coordinating Goals, Preferences, Options, and Analyses for the Stanford Living Laboratory Feasibility Study , 2006, EG-ICE.

[5]  Karyn M. Warsow Transportation public health link: Changing perspectives…Changing a culture through cross-disciplinary collaboration , 2015 .

[6]  P Healey,et al.  Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning , 1998 .

[7]  Johannes Horner,et al.  Collaborating , 2009 .

[8]  F. Berkes Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[9]  A. Bauman,et al.  Health-enhancing physical activity across European Union countries: the Eurobarometer study , 2006, Journal of Public Health.

[10]  M. Scott,et al.  Barriers to Active Transport in Palmerston North , 2015 .

[11]  R. Barnett The coming of the ecological university , 2011 .

[12]  J. Genter,et al.  Valuing the Health Benefits of Active Transport Modes , 2008 .

[13]  Tarah Wright,et al.  Developing research priorities with a cohort of higher education for sustainability experts , 2007 .

[14]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[15]  P. Healey Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[16]  Steve Selin,et al.  Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management , 1995 .

[17]  James Martin,et al.  The Sustainable University: Green Goals and New Challenges for Higher Education Leaders. By JAMES E. MARTIN , 2013 .

[18]  Anne McMurray,et al.  Community Health and Wellness: Primary Health Care in Practice , 2006 .