Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C Jessica E Metcalf,et al. Why evolutionary biologists should be demographers. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[2] A. Pischedda,et al. Intralocus Sexual Conflict Diminishes the Benefits of Sexual Selection , 2006, PLoS biology.
[3] L. Kruuk,et al. LIVE FAST, DIE YOUNG: TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN FITNESS COMPONENTS AND SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC SELECTION ON WEAPONRY IN SOAY SHEEP , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[4] Sasha R. X. Dall,et al. Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[5] L. Kruuk. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model". , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[6] Timothy A Mousseau,et al. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness , 2004, Nature.
[7] Michael Turelli,et al. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions. , 2004, Genetics.
[8] B. Sinervo,et al. Within‐clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[9] W. Heath,et al. Dangerous liaisons , 2003 .
[10] T. C. Marshall,et al. Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] Tim Clutton-Brock,et al. ANTLER SIZE IN RED DEER: HERITABILITY AND SELECTION BUT NO EVOLUTION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[12] W. Rice,et al. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[13] W. Rice,et al. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict , 2001 .
[14] H. Kokko. Fisherian and "good genes" benefits of mate choice: how (not) to distinguish between them , 2001 .
[15] W. Rice,et al. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] S. Leal. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 2001 .
[17] L. Kruuk,et al. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] L. Kruuk,et al. Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[19] P. Hedrick. Antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic polymorphism: a perspective , 1999, Heredity.
[20] A. Forsman. Opposing fitness consequences of colour pattern in male and female snakes , 1995 .
[21] T. Meagher. THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SILENE LATIFOLIA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE). II. RESPONSE TO SEX‐SPECIFIC SELECTION , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[22] W. Rice. Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. , 1992, Science.
[23] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .
[24] T. Meagher. THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SILENE LATIFOLIA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE). I. GENETIC VARIATION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[25] W. Rice. SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. The Costs of Reproduction to Red Deer Hinds , 1983 .
[27] L. Kruuk,et al. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations , 2004, Genetica.
[28] Brit Grosskopf,et al. Experimental Evidence * , 2001 .
[29] M. Lynch,et al. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .
[30] D. Houle. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. , 1992, Genetics.
[31] E. P. Lewis. In perspective. , 1972, Nursing outlook.
[32] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. Edinburgh Research Explorer Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 2022 .