A review of two theories of motion sickness and their implications for tall building motion sway

Low-frequency building vibration is known to induce symptoms of motion sickness in some occupants. This paper examines how the adoption of a theory of motion sickness, in conjunction with a dose-response model might inform the real-world problem of managing and designing standards for tall building motion sway. Building designers require an understanding of human responses to low-dosage motion that is not adequately considered by research into motion sickness. The traditional framework of Sensory Conflict Theory is contrasted with Postural Instability Theory. The most severe responses to motion (i.e., vomiting) are not experienced by occupants of wind-excited buildings. It is predicted that typical response sets to low-dosage motion (sleepiness and fatigue), which has not previously been measured in occupants of tall-buildings, are experienced by building occupants. These low-dose symptoms may either be masked from observation by the activity of occupants or misattributed to the demands of a typical working day. An investigation of the real-world relationship between building motion and the observation of low-dose motion sickness symptoms and a degradation of workplace performance would quantify these effects and reveal whether a greater focus on designing for occupant comfort is needed.

[1]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[2]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Stance Width Influences Postural Stability and Motion Sickness , 2010 .

[3]  L. Burrows,et al.  Evaluating sensory conflict and postural instability. theories of motion sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[4]  B BAR,et al.  Treatment of inveterate cicatricial strictures in the esophagus. , 1954, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  Elise Faugloire,et al.  Motion sickness preceded by unstable displacements of the center of pressure. , 2006, Human movement science.

[6]  Moira B. Flanagan,et al.  Postural Instability and Motion Sickness in a Virtual Moving Room , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Osman Turan,et al.  Motion sickness onboard ships: subjective vertical theory and its application to full-scale trials , 2009 .

[8]  J. Golding.  Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire , 2006 .

[9]  Gary E. Riccio,et al.  An Ecological Critique of the Sensory Conflict Theory of Motion Sickness , 1991 .

[10]  M. Treisman.  Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. , 1977, Science.

[11]  J. Lishman,et al.  The Autonomy of Visual Kinaesthesis , 1973, Perception.

[12]  P. Stern.  Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[14]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  An experimental study of low-frequency motion in cars , 2004 .

[15]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  An ecological Theory of Motion Sickness and Postural Instability , 1991 .

[16]  Andy T. K. Ho,et al.  A Metric to Quantify Virtual Scene Movement for the Study of Cybersickness: Definition, Implementation, and Verification , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  W. Bles,et al.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  Yoichi Yokota,et al.  Motion sickness susceptibility associated with visually induced postural instability and cardiac autonomic responses in healthy subjects , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  F E Guedry,et al.  Comparison of tracking-task performance and nystagmus during sinusoidal oscillation in yaw and pitch. , 1971, Aerospace medicine.

[20]  Moira B. Flanagan,et al.  Motion Sickness and Postural Sway in Console Video Games , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Perception of vibration and occupant comfort in wind-excited tall buildings , 2009 .

[22]  S J ALEXANDER,et al.  Studies of motion sickness; the effects upon sickness rates of waves of various frequencies but identical acceleration. , 1947, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. W. Irwin.  Perception, comfort and performance criteria for human beings exposed to whole body pure yaw vibration and vibration containing yaw and translational components , 1981 .

[24]  J T Reason,et al.  Motion Sickness Adaptation: A Neural Mismatch Model 1 , 1978, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[25]  Julie M. Drexler,et al.  Research in visually induced motion sickness. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  B. Bowins,et al.  Motion sickness: A negative reinforcement model , 2010, Brain Research Bulletin.

[27]  J. Golding.  Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[28]  L. James Smart,et al.  Consequence of Self Versus Externally Generated Visual Motion on Postural Regulation , 2010 .

[29]  W. H. Melbourne,et al.  Accelerations and comfort criteria for buildings undergoing complex motions , 1992 .

[30]  L. Eisenman,et al.  Motion sickness may be caused by a neurohumoral action of acetylcholine. , 2009, Medical hypotheses.