Multifidelity Statistical Analysis of Large Eddy Simulations in Scramjet Computations

The development of scramjet engines is an important research area for advancing hypersonic and orbital flights. Progress towards optimal engine designs requires accurate and computationally affordable flow simulations, as well as uncertainty quantification (UQ). While traditional UQ techniques can become prohibitive under expensive simulations and high-dimensional parameter spaces, polynomial chaos (PC) surrogate modeling is a useful tool for alleviating some of the computational burden. However, non-intrusive quadraturebased constructions of PC expansions relying on a single high-fidelity model can still be quite expensive. We thus introduce a two-stage numerical procedure for constructing PC surrogates while making use of multiple models of different fidelity. The first stage involves an initial dimension reduction through global sensitivity analysis using compressive sensing. The second stage utilizes adaptive sparse quadrature on a multifidelity expansion to compute PC surrogate coefficients in the reduced parameter space where quadrature methods can be more effective. The overall method is used to produce accurate surrogates and to propagate uncertainty induced by uncertain boundary conditions and turbulence model parameters, for performance quantities of interest from large eddy simulations of supersonic reactive flows inside a scramjet engine.

[1]  Thomas Gerstner,et al.  Dimension–Adaptive Tensor–Product Quadrature , 2003, Computing.

[2]  Guilhem Lacaze,et al.  Effects of Real-Fluid Thermodynamics on High-Pressure Fuel Injection Processes. , 2014 .

[3]  Erich Novak,et al.  High dimensional polynomial interpolation on sparse grids , 2000, Adv. Comput. Math..

[4]  C. Law,et al.  A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction , 2005 .

[5]  Douglas J. Dolvin,et al.  Hypersonic International Flight Research and Experimentation Technology Development and Flight Certification Strategy , 2009 .

[6]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[7]  Leo Wai-Tsun Ng,et al.  Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Using Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation , 2012 .

[8]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[9]  Lloyd G. Wilson,et al.  Opposed Jet Burner Extinction Limits: Simple Mixed Hydrocarbon Scramjet Fuels vs Air , 2007 .

[10]  Xun Huan,et al.  Compressive sensing adaptation for polynomial chaos expansions , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Johan Larsson,et al.  Exploiting active subspaces to quantify uncertainty in the numerical simulation of the HyShot II scramjet , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  Benjamin Peherstorfer,et al.  Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization , 2018, SIAM Rev..

[13]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Using Spectral Stochastic Discrepancy Models. , 2015 .

[14]  Xun Huan,et al.  Compressive Sensing with Cross-Validation and Stop-Sampling for Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions , 2017, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[15]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  Gianluca Geraci,et al.  A multifidelity multilevel Monte Carlo method for uncertainty propagation in aerospace applications , 2017 .

[17]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2009 .

[18]  Joseph C. Oefelein,et al.  Toward Validation of Large Eddy Simulation for Turbulent Combustion , 2006 .

[19]  Xun Huan,et al.  Enhancing Model Predictability for a Scramjet Using Probabilistic Learning on Manifolds , 2019, AIAA Journal.

[20]  Paul G. Ferlemann Forebody and Inlet Design for the HIFiRE 2 Flight Test , 2008 .

[21]  J. Oefelein Simulation and analysis of turbulent multiphase combustion processes at high pressures , 1997 .

[22]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[23]  Neal E. Hass,et al.  HIFiRE Direct-Connect Rig (HDCR) Phase I Scramjet Test Results from the NASA Langley Arc-Heated Scramjet Test Facility , 2011 .

[24]  Jiwen Liu,et al.  Combustor Operability and Performance Verification for HIFiRE Flight 2 , 2011 .

[25]  Douglas J. Dolvin,et al.  Hypersonic International Flight Research and Experimentation (HIFiRE) Fundamental Sciences and Technology Development Strategy , 2008 .

[26]  Thomas Gerstner,et al.  Numerical integration using sparse grids , 2004, Numerical Algorithms.

[27]  Vigor Yang,et al.  Analysis of hydrogen-oxygen mixing and combustion processes at high pressures , 1997 .

[28]  Todd Barhorst,et al.  The HIFiRE Flight 2 Experiment: An Overview and Status Update , 2009 .

[29]  Guilhem Lacaze,et al.  Analysis of high-pressure Diesel fuel injection processes using LES with real-fluid thermodynamics and transport , 2013 .

[30]  Jiwen Liu,et al.  Hydrocarbon-Fueled Scramjet Combustor Flowpath Development for Mach 6-8 HIFire Flight Experiments (Preprint) , 2008 .

[31]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[32]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[33]  Harsha K. Chelliah,et al.  Explicit reduced reaction models for ignition, flame propagation, and extinction of C2H4/CH4/H2 and air systems , 2007 .

[34]  Xun Huan,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis and Quantification of Model Error for Large Eddy Simulation in Scramjet Design , 2017 .

[35]  Joseph C. Oefelein,et al.  Large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion processes in propulsion and power systems , 2006 .

[36]  Zachary P. Vane,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of the HIFiRE Direct Connect Rig Scramjet Combustor. , 2017 .

[37]  D. Xiu Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review , 2009 .

[38]  Mark R. Gruber,et al.  HIFiRE FLIGHT 2 FLOWPATH DESIGN UPDATE (PREPRINT) , 2009 .

[39]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[40]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and error estimation in scramjet simulation , 2011 .

[41]  相原 龍,et al.  Alternating Direction Method of Multipliersを用いた声質変換のためのパラレル辞書学習 , 2015 .

[42]  Kai H. Luo,et al.  45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit , 2009 .

[43]  Neal Hass,et al.  HIFIRE DIRECT-CONNECT RIG (HDCR) PHASE I GROUND TEST RESULTS FROM THE NASA LANGLEY ARC-HEATED SCRAMJET TEST FACILITY , 2009 .

[44]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[45]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Xun Huan,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis and Quantification of Model Error in Scramjet Computations , 2017 .