Analysis of the network constraints' effects on strategic behavior in an incomplete information environment

This paper analyzes the network constraints' effects on power suppliers' strategic behaviors and the market equilibrium. Observing the fact that the trading schedules determined by MCP have to be adjusted or curtailed due to the network constraints, we investigate different curtailment criterions' impacts on the final market equilibrium. We find that due to the network constraints, the final equilibrium will be quite different from the initial equilibrium. The result indicates that bidders have incentives to mark up their bids remarkably above their production costs. The Bayesian approach is used to deal with incomplete information and we find that bidders will make relatively conservative decisions compared with complete information.

[1]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  小島 健司 Drew Fudenberg and Jean Tirole, Game Theory , 1992 .

[3]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Dynamic cooperative electricity exchange in a power pool , 1989, Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  An Empirical Study of Applied Game Theory: Transmission Constrained Cournot Behavior , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[5]  Harry Singh,et al.  Power auctions and network constraints , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[7]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Dynamic cooperative electricity exchange in a power pool , 1989, Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[8]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Generation strategies for gaming transmission constraints. Will the deregulated electric power market be an oligopoly? , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[10]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Linear Complementarity Models of Nash-Cournot Competition in Bilateral and POOLCO Power Markets , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  T. Morin,et al.  A Stackelberg price leadership model with application to deregulated electricity markets , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[12]  J. Pang,et al.  Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach , 2000 .

[13]  A. David,et al.  Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).