A nonlinear cohesive model for mixed-mode delamination of composite laminates

Abstract An anisotropic nonlinear cohesive model based on continuum damage mechanics is proposed to predict the mixed-mode delamination initiation and growth of composite laminates numerically. A damaged exponential traction–displacement jump relationship is proposed for the cohesive model and an exponential damage evolution law on the evolvement of displacement jump is proposed to describe the irreversible delamination crack propagation. The implementation of cohesive model uses zero-thickness cohesive element and middle-plane isoparametric interpolation technique. The mesh size effect is solved by regulating the delamination fracture toughness by the cohesive length, and the numerical convergence problem for the snap instability is addressed by viscous regularization. Four representative delamination cases of composite laminates are used to validate the proposed cohesive model: (a) double cantilever beam (mode-I), (b) end notch flexure (mode-II), (c) mixed-mode bending fracture, and (d) fixed ratio mixed mode. The effects of the cohesive strengths and mesh sizes on the global load–displacement response for four cases are studied. In addition, the numerical results using proposed cohesive model are also compared with the results obtained by the virtual crack closure technique and other existing cohesive models. The proposed cohesive model is demonstrated to predict the mixed-mode delamination response of composite laminates accurately and effectively.

[1]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[2]  M. Benzeggagh,et al.  Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus , 1996 .

[3]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Crack band theory for fracture of concrete , 1983 .

[4]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  A concise interface constitutive law for analysis of delamination and splitting in composite materials and its application to scaled notched tensile specimens , 2007 .

[5]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Remarks on Crack-Bridging Concepts , 1992 .

[6]  F. L. Matthews,et al.  Predicting Progressive Delamination of Composite Material Specimens via Interface Elements , 1999 .

[7]  A. Vautrin,et al.  An interface debonding law subject to viscous regularization for avoiding instability: Application to the delamination problems , 2008 .

[8]  Jinyang Zheng,et al.  Recent developments on damage modeling and finite element analysis for composite laminates: A review , 2010 .

[9]  G. Paulino,et al.  On the enhancement of bond toughness for Al/epoxy T-peel joints with laser treated substrates , 2011 .

[10]  J. Chaboche,et al.  Mechanics of Solid Materials , 1990 .

[11]  Jr. J. Crews,et al.  Mixed-Mode Bending Method for Delamination Testing , 1990 .

[12]  D. Borst,et al.  A NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MODE-I FREE EDGE DELAMINATION IN COMPOSITES , 1993 .

[13]  S Sridharan,et al.  Predicting and tracking interlaminar crack growth in composites using a cohesive layer model , 2001 .

[14]  M. Elices,et al.  The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges , 2002 .

[15]  E. J. Öpik,et al.  Physics of the Earth's Interior , 1959 .

[16]  N. Chandra,et al.  Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces , 2002 .

[17]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: Definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness , 2010 .

[18]  P. Camanho,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Mode Progressive Delamination in Composite Materials , 2003 .

[19]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture , 2009 .

[20]  Rui Huang,et al.  A comparison of direct and iterative methods for determining traction-separation relations , 2012, International Journal of Fracture.

[21]  R. Borst Numerical aspects of cohesive-zone models , 2003 .

[22]  J. Mosler,et al.  A thermodynamically and variationally consistent class of damage-type cohesive models , 2011 .

[23]  G. I. Barenblatt THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[24]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Towards a bridge between the micro- and mesomechanics of delamination for laminated composites , 2006 .

[25]  Qingda Yang,et al.  Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites , 2005 .

[26]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination , 2008 .

[27]  De Xie,et al.  Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis , 2006 .

[28]  Jinyang Zheng,et al.  Finite element analysis of postbuckling and delamination of composite laminates using virtual crack closure technique , 2011 .

[29]  De Xie,et al.  Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique , 2006 .

[30]  M. Kanninen,et al.  A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral , 1977 .

[31]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[32]  John H. Crews,et al.  The mixed-mode bending method for delamination testing , 1989 .

[33]  Somnath Ghosh,et al.  Analysis of Interfacial Debonding in Three-Dimensional Composite Microstructures , 2006 .

[34]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading , 2006 .

[35]  Carlos G. Davila,et al.  Irreversible constitutive law for modeling the delamination process using interfacial surface discontinuities , 2004 .

[36]  Ronald Krueger,et al.  The Virtual Crack Closure Technique : History , Approach and Applications , 2002 .

[37]  Brian N. Cox,et al.  Concepts for bridged cracks in fracture and fatigue , 1994 .

[38]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Inverse computation of cohesive fracture properties from displacement fields , 2010 .

[39]  Stefanie Feih,et al.  Development of a user element in ABAQUS for modelling of cohesive laws in composite structures , 2006 .

[40]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[41]  I. Scheider,et al.  On the practical application of the cohesive model , 2003 .

[42]  Yanfei Gao,et al.  A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces , 2004 .

[43]  de R René Borst,et al.  On the numerical integration of interface elements , 1993 .

[44]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models , 2007 .

[45]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids , 1994 .

[46]  Javier Segurado,et al.  A new three-dimensional interface finite element to simulate fracture in composites , 2004 .

[47]  D. S. Dugdale Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[48]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Solution strategies for the delamination analysis based on a combination of local‐control arc‐length and line searches , 2003 .

[49]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  Mode I intra-laminar crack growth in composites — modelling of R-curves from measured bridging laws , 2001 .

[50]  Lorenzo Iannucci,et al.  A coupled mixed-mode delamination model for laminated composites , 2011 .