Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study

PurposeThe aim of this study is to develop and analyse a life cycle inventory of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) management systems based on primary data collected directly from Spanish enterprises involved in the life cycle of this type of waste material. Special emphasis is placed on assessing the environmental profile of inert waste sorting and treatment (IWST) facilities.MethodsTaking the management of 1 t of C&DW as the functional unit, this study describes the boundaries of the C&DW management system and the scope of the research, which includes all stages from the temporary storage of waste in containers to its recovery or disposal on landfills. Primary data were collected directly from some Spanish enterprises involved in the life cycle of C&DW management: two firms that manufacture containers and bags, two companies responsible for the temporary storage of waste and transporting it, five firms devoted to sorting and treating the waste and two enterprises that operate inert landfills. Special attention was given to the IWST facilities, whose inventory data were related to four phases: pre-treatment and the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. Finally, indicators were obtained for different impact categories.ResultsThe environmental profiles of IWST facilities for mixed C&DW show that the greatest environmental impacts are produced in primary and tertiary sectors. From the life cycle analysis of C&DW management, it can be seen that transport, sorting and disposal make a net contribution to the environmental impact. Savings are due to the recycling of plastics, metals, aggregates and wood for all the impact assessment categories, except global warming in the case of wood and cardboard.ConclusionsImpact of IWST can be reduced by selective collection at source, since it avoids the separation of light fractions at plants. Life cycle assessment of C&DW shows that transportation stage plays a decisive role and recycling is not always beneficial.

[1]  Simone Manfredi,et al.  Environmental assessment of Ämmässuo Landfill (Finland) by means of LCA-modelling (EASEWASTE) , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[2]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[3]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[4]  Hsien Hui Khoo,et al.  Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Characterizing the Importance of Carbon Stored in Wood Products , 2010 .

[6]  Forbes R McDougall,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Lifecycle Inventory , 1995 .

[7]  M D Bovea,et al.  Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study. , 2010, Waste management.

[8]  Jamie Meil,et al.  Prospects for carbon-neutral housing: the influence of greater wood use on the carbon footprint of a single-family residence , 2009 .

[9]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .

[10]  Simonetta Tunesi,et al.  LCA of local strategies for energy recovery from waste in England, applied to a large municipal flow. , 2011, Waste management.

[11]  P Buttol,et al.  LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna District. , 2007, Waste management.

[12]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[13]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): the role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix , 2010 .

[14]  Roger Sathre,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products and Greenhouse Gas Impacts , 2008 .

[15]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[16]  Eric Johnson.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[17]  Jung-Wk Kim,et al.  Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  O Ortiz,et al.  Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. , 2010, Waste management.

[19]  M D Bovea,et al.  Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  J den Boer,et al.  LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems. , 2007, Waste management.

[21]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[22]  Arianna Dominici Loprieno,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of waste management systems in Italian industrial areas: Case study of 1st Macrolotto of Prato , 2009 .

[23]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[24]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Influence of assumptions about selection and recycling efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems , 2009 .

[25]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. , 2010 .