Effects of pre- and post-emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals

Summary To assess the effects of timing and frequency of weed harrowing on weed abundance and crop yield, different pre- and post-emergence weed harrowing sequences were applied to spring cereals and peas in field experiments performed during 2003 and 2004 in Sweden. Post-emergence harrowing was performed at crop growth stages 2–3 and 5–6 true leaves respectively. The best weed control was obtained by a combination of preand post-emergence harrowing, but these treatments also caused yield losses of 12–14% in spring cereals, while no yield losses were observed in peas. Preemergence weed harrowing treatments alone or combined with weed harrowing shortly after crop emergence proved to be most effective against the early emerging annual weed species Sinapis arvensis and Galeopsis spp. Post-emergence harrowing alone in peas had no effect on S. arvensis. The late emerging annual weed species Chenopodium album and Polygonum lapathifolium were most effectively controlled when pre-emergence weed harrowing was combined with one or two weed harrowing treatments after crop emergence.

[1]  Bo Melander,et al.  Selectivity of weed harrowing in lupin , 2004 .

[2]  P. Lancashire,et al.  A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds , 1991 .

[3]  Paolo Bàrberi,et al.  Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control— examples from European research , 2005, Weed Science.

[4]  A. C. Grundy,et al.  Non‐chemical weed management in organic farming systems , 2001 .

[5]  Jesper Rasmussen,et al.  Selective Weed Harrowing in Cereals , 1995 .

[6]  R. Butler,et al.  The effect of different frequencies of harrowing in the autumn or spring on winter wheat, and on the control of Stellaria media (L.) vill., Galium aparine L. and Brassica napus L. , 1993 .

[7]  A. Lundkvist,et al.  Effects of organic farming on weed flora composition in a long term perspective , 2008 .

[8]  J. M. Thomas,et al.  Mechanical control of Galium aparine in winter wheat. , 1994 .

[9]  J. Juul Rasmussen,et al.  Investigating the selectivity of weed harrowing with new methods , 2008 .

[10]  B. Melander,et al.  Effects of cultural methods and physical weed control on intrarow weed numbers, manual weeding and marketable yield in direct‐sown leek and bulb onion , 2001 .

[11]  Bo Melander,et al.  Relationship between speed, soil movement into the cereal row and intra‐row weed control efficacy by weed harrowing , 2003 .

[12]  J. Zadoks.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[13]  K. Taylor.  Galium aparine L. , 1999 .

[14]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  Method for predicting selective uprooting by mechanical weeders from plant anchorage forces , 2004, Weed Science.

[15]  Torbjörn Rydberg,et al.  Weed Harrowing—the Influence of Driving Speed and Driving Direction on Degree of Soil Covering and the Growth of Weed and Crop Plants , 1994 .

[16]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Barley seed vigour and mechanical weed control , 2008 .

[17]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Weed control in organic farming systems. , 1995 .

[18]  Niels Holst,et al.  Tolerance of four spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties to weed harrowing , 2007 .

[19]  D. C. Cloutier,et al.  Mechanical weed management. , 2007 .

[20]  I. Rasmussen,et al.  The effect of sowing date, stale seedbed, row width and mechanical weed control on weeds and yields of organic winter wheat , 2004 .

[21]  D. Goense,et al.  Selective uprooting by weed harrowing on sandy soils , 2000 .

[22]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Yield response models for mechanical weed control by harrowing at early crop growth stages in peas (Pisum sativum L.) , 1993 .

[23]  D. T. Baumann,et al.  Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? , 2008 .

[24]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  The impact of uprooting and soil‐covering on the effectiveness of weed harrowing , 2001 .