Sensitivity analysis techniques applied to a system of hyperbolic conservation laws

Sensitivity analysis is comprised of techniques to quantify the effects of the input variables on a set of outputs. In particular, sensitivity indices can be used to infer which input parameters most significantly affect the results of a computational model. With continually increasing computing power, sensitivity analysis has become an important technique by which to understand the behavior of large-scale computer simulations. Many sensitivity analysis methods rely on sampling from distributions of the inputs. Such sampling-based methods can be computationally expensive, requiring many evaluations of the simulation; in this case, the Sobol' method provides an easy and accurate way to compute variance-based measures, provided a sufficient number of model evaluations are available. As an alternative, meta-modeling approaches have been devised to approximate the response surface and estimate various measures of sensitivity. In this work, we consider a variety of sensitivity analysis methods, including different sampling strategies, different meta-models, and different ways of evaluating variance-based sensitivity indices. The problem we consider is the 1-D Riemann problem. By a careful choice of inputs, discontinuous solutions are obtained, leading to discontinuous response surfaces; such surfaces can be particularly problematic for meta-modeling approaches. The goal of this study is to compare the estimated sensitivity indices with exact values and to evaluate the convergence of these estimates with increasing samples sizes and under an increasing number of meta-model evaluations.

[1]  M. Eldred Recent Advances in Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation Methods for Uncertainty Analysis and Design , 2009 .

[2]  Peter C. Young,et al.  State Dependent Parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[3]  J. Smoller Shock Waves and Reaction-Diffusion Equations , 1983 .

[4]  D. Xiu Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach , 2010 .

[5]  Peter C. Young,et al.  The Identification and Estimation of Nonlinear Stochastic Systems , 2001 .

[6]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[7]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[8]  Sergei S. Kucherenko,et al.  On global sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms , 2005, Monte Carlo Methods Appl..

[9]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[10]  Hao Helen Zhang,et al.  Component selection and smoothing in multivariate nonparametric regression , 2006, math/0702659.

[11]  Alistair I. Mees Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistics , 2012 .

[12]  Chong Gu Smoothing Spline Anova Models , 2002 .

[13]  E. Toro Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 1997 .

[14]  Abdelali Gabih,et al.  An ε-Optimal Portfolio with Stochastic Volatility , 2005, Monte Carlo Methods Appl..

[15]  M. Eldred,et al.  Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized Polynomial Chaos. , 2008 .

[16]  Brian J Reich,et al.  Surface Estimation, Variable Selection, and the Nonparametric Oracle Property. , 2011, Statistica Sinica.

[17]  H. Rabitz,et al.  High Dimensional Model Representations , 2001 .

[18]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[19]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[20]  M. Jansen Analysis of variance designs for model output , 1999 .

[21]  Otto Eric Strack,et al.  ALEGRA : an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian multimaterial, multiphysics code. , 2008 .

[22]  M. Ratto,et al.  Using recursive algorithms for the efficient identification of smoothing spline ANOVA models , 2010 .

[23]  G. Wahba Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[24]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Version 5.0, user's reference manual. , 2010 .

[25]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[26]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Numerical Challenges in the Use of Polynomial Chaos Representations for Stochastic Processes , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  Clinton P. T. Groth,et al.  Assessment of Riemann solvers for unsteady one-dimensional inviscid flows for perfect gases , 1988 .

[28]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[29]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  I. Sobol Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property , 1976 .

[31]  H. Rabitz,et al.  General foundations of high‐dimensional model representations , 1999 .

[32]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[33]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[34]  Harald Niederreiter,et al.  Implementation and tests of low-discrepancy sequences , 1992, TOMC.