Sovereignty and the UFO

Modern sovereignty is anthropocentric, constituted and organized by reference to human beings alone. Although a metaphysical assumption, anthropocentrism is of immense practical import, enabling modern states to command loyalty and resources from their subjects in pursuit of political projects. It has limits, however, which are brought clearly into view by the authoritative taboo on taking UFOs seriously. UFOs have never been systematically investigated by science or the state, because it is assumed to be known that none are extraterrestrial. Yet in fact this is not known, which makes the UFO taboo puzzling given the ET possibility. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, the puzzle is explained by the functional imperatives of anthropocentric sovereignty, which cannot decide a UFO exception to anthropocentrism while preserving the ability to make such a decision. The UFO can be “known” only by not asking what it is.

[1]  Michel Foucault,et al.  The Order of Things , 2010 .

[2]  Yoav Rinon.  Plato's Pharmacy , 1992 .

[3]  M. Yar.  From nature to history, and back again: Blumenberg, Strauss and the Hobbesian community , 2002 .

[4]  Sven Rosenkranz.  Agnosticism as a Third Stance , 2007 .

[5]  M. Fogg.  Temporal aspects of the interaction among the first galactic civilizations: The “interdict hypothesis” , 1987 .

[6]  S. Stride.  An Instrument-Based Method to Search for Extraterrestrial Interstellar Robotic Probes , 2001 .

[7]  Felicity Mellor,et al.  Colliding Worlds , 2007 .

[8]  B. Baars.  Subjective experience is probably not limited to humans: The evidence from neurobiology and behavior , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Giorgio Agamben,et al.  The State of Exception , 2005, Politics, Metaphysics, and Death.

[10]  N. Tuana.  Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance , 2004, Hypatia.

[11]  Roger Smith,et al.  The Norton history of the human sciences , 1997 .

[12]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Type I and Type II Errors , 1997 .

[13]  B. Maccabee,et al.  Inflation-Theory Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation , 2005 .

[14]  Silvia T. Maurer Lane.  Ideology and Consciousness , 1999 .

[15]  Carl Schmitt,et al.  Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty , 1986 .

[16]  S. Prozorov.  X/Xs: Toward a General Theory of the Exception , 2005 .

[17]  N. Tannenwald.  The nuclear taboo , 2007 .

[18]  Private Science and Public Knowledge: The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Claims of the Paranormal and its Use of the Literature , 1984 .

[19]  M. Foucault.  Society Must Be Defended , 2003 .

[20]  A. Harrison,et al.  The Kennedy Assassination, Unidentified Flying Objects, and Other Conspiracies: Psychological and Organizational Factors in the Perception of ""Cover‐up'' , 1997 .

[21]  Jack Reynolds,et al.  Habituality and Undecidability: A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on the Decision , 2002 .

[22]  Peter Lipton,et al.  The epistemology of testimony , 1998 .

[23]  J. Ball.  The zoo hypothesis , 1973 .

[24]  Douglas V. Porpora,et al.  Methodological Atheism, Methodological Agnosticism and Religious Experience , 2006 .

[25]  Gesa Lindemann,et al.  The analysis of the borders of the social world: A challenge for sociological theory , 2005 .

[26]  Sebastian von Hoerner,et al.  Where is everybody? , 1978, Naturwissenschaften.

[27]  Jennifer Mitzen,et al.  Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma , 2006 .

[28]  E. Berryman.  Taking Pictures of Jesus: Producing the Material Presence of a Divine Other , 2005 .

[29]  Peter A. Sturrock,et al.  Report on a Survey of the Membership of the American Astronomical Society Concerning the UFO Problem: Part 1") , 1994 .

[30]  Engineering the Zero-Point Field and Polarizable Vacuum For Interstellar Flight , 2001, 1012.5264.

[31]  R. Jahn,et al.  The PEAR proposition. , 2007, Explore.

[32]  Giorgio Agamben,et al.  The Open: Man and Animal , 2003 .

[33]  L. Daston.  Biographies of scientific objects , 2000 .

[34]  N. Tannenwald.  The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use , 1999, International Organization.

[35]  M. Caze,et al.  The Encounter between Wonder and Generosity , 2002, Hypatia.

[36]  Peter Galison.  Removing Knowledge , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[37]  Marguerite la Caze.  The Encounter between Wonder and Generosity , 2002 .

[38]  Aletta Norval.  Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability , 2004 .

[39]  A. Harrington.  Habermas's Theological Turn? , 2007 .

[40]  R. Westrum.  Social Intelligence About Anomalies: The Case of UFOs , 1977 .

[41]  Peter Kosso.  Detecting extrasolar planets , 2006 .