Beyond Restenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes From Second-Generation Coronary Stent Trials

Background—In the first year after coronary stent implantation, clinical failures are driven mainly by procedural complications and restenosis, but the subsequent relative contributions of restenosis and disease progression to late failures are less clear. Methods and Results—We observed 1228 patients for 5 years after the implantation of stents as part of pivotal second-generation coronary stent trials. Clinical events of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and repeat hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or congestive heart failure were attributed to the index stented (target) lesion or other distinct sites (either in the target or other coronary vessels) and further classified as procedural, restenosis, or nonrestenosis. During the first year the hazard rate was 18.3% for target-lesion events and 12.4% for events unrelated to the target lesion. After the first year the average annual hazard rate was 1.7% for target-lesion events and 6.3% for nontarget-lesion events. By the fifth year, restenosis events occurred in 20.3% of patients, whereas 30-day procedural complications or later nonrestenosis events occurred in 37.9%, including 11.4% who also experienced a restenosis event, for a combined cumulative event rate of 46.4%. Diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease were independently associated with increased risk for both restenosis and nonrestenosis events. Conclusion—In a low-risk clinical trial population, the clinical outcome beyond 1 year after stenting is determined by a high rate of events related to disease progression in segments other than the stented lesion, which itself remains relatively stable.

[1]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  D. Baim,et al.  Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: perspectives from multicenter clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  S. Ellis,et al.  Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[6]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Stent Placement in Native Coronary Arteries , 2002, Circulation.

[7]  W Rutsch,et al.  Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  D. Baim,et al.  Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era: A Pooled Analysis of Multicenter Coronary Stent Clinical Trials , 2001, Circulation.

[9]  The Esprit investigators Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Predictors of mortality and mortality from cardiac causes in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) randomized trial and registry. For the BARI Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  S. Kleinert HOPE for cardiovascular disease prevention with ACE-inhibitor ramipril , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  T. Investigators Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. , 1998, Lancet.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  Myonecrosis after revascularization procedures. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Baim,et al.  Long-term (4- to 6-year) outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting: paucity of late clinical stent-related problems. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Ousa,et al.  A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF A SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENT WITH A STANDARD STENT FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION , 2002 .

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Predictors of Mortality and Mortality From Cardiac Causes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Randomized Trial and Registry , 2000 .

[18]  V. Paul,et al.  Recruited collateral channels are not responsible for ischemic preconditioning during single vessel angioplasty , 1998 .