Discovering Your Inner Bat: Echo–Acoustic Target Ranging in Humans

Echolocation is typically associated with bats and toothed whales. To date, only few studies have investigated echolocation in humans. Moreover, these experiments were conducted with real objects in real rooms; a configuration in which features of both vocal emissions and perceptual cues are difficult to analyse and control. We investigated human sonar target-ranging in virtual echo-acoustic space, using a short-latency, real-time convolution engine. Subjects produced tongue clicks, which were picked up by a headset microphone, digitally delayed, convolved with individual head-related transfer functions and played back through earphones, thus simulating a reflecting surface at a specific range in front of the subject. In an adaptive 2-AFC paradigm, we measured the perceptual sensitivity to changes of the range for reference ranges of 1.7, 3.4 or 6.8 m. In a follow-up experiment, a second simulated surface at a lateral position and a fixed range was added, expected to act either as an interfering masker or a useful reference. The psychophysical data show that the subjects were well capable to discriminate differences in the range of a frontal reflector. The range–discrimination thresholds were typically below 1 m and, for a reference range of 1.7 m, they were typically below 0.5 m. Performance improved when a second reflector was introduced at a lateral angle of 45°. A detailed analysis of the tongue clicks showed that the subjects typically produced short, broadband palatal clicks with durations between 3 and 15 ms, and sound levels between 60 and 108 dB. Typically, the tongue clicks had relatively high peak frequencies around 6 to 8 kHz. Through the combination of highly controlled psychophysical experiments in virtual space and a detailed analysis of both the subjects’ performance and their emitted tongue clicks, the current experiments provide insights into both vocal motor and sensory processes recruited by humans that aim to explore their environment by echolocation.

[1]  W. N. Kellogg,et al.  Sonar system of the blind. , 1962, Science.

[2]  S. Ewert,et al.  Perceptual Sensitivity to High-Frequency Interaural Time Differences Created by Rustling Sounds , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[3]  Björn M. Siemers,et al.  Why do shrews twitter? Communication or simple echo-based orientation , 2009, Biology Letters.

[4]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  The Sonar of Dolphins , 1993, Springer New York.

[5]  I. G. Bassett,et al.  Echolocation: Measurement of Pitch versus Distance for Sounds Reflected from a Flat Surface , 1964 .

[6]  A. E. Murchison,et al.  Detection Range and Range Resolution of Echolocating Bottlenose Porpoise (Tursiops truncatus) , 1980 .

[7]  D. Griffin.  Listening in the dark: The acoustic orientation of bats and men. , 1958 .

[8]  R. Fay,et al.  Pitch : neural coding and perception , 2005 .

[9]  R. Fay,et al.  Hearing by Bats , 1995, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[10]  N Suga,et al.  Target range-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. , 1979, Science.

[11]  C E RICE,et al.  Sonar System of the Blind: Size Discrimination , 1965, Science.

[12]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Bone-Conducted Sound: Physiological and Clinical Aspects , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  E I Knudsen,et al.  The oilbird: hearing and echolocation. , 1979, Science.

[14]  H.-U. Schnitzler,et al.  Echo SPL, training experience, and experimental procedure influence the ranging performance in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  Mats E Nilsson,et al.  Human Echolocation: Blind and Sighted Persons' Ability to Detect Sounds Recorded in the Presence of a Reflecting Object , 2010, Perception.

[16]  R. Busnel,et al.  Animal Sonar Systems , 1980, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series.

[17]  David Whitney,et al.  Ultrafine spatial acuity of blind expert human echolocators , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Palmer.  Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[19]  J. Simmons.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Holger R Goerlitz,et al.  Sonar detection of jittering real targets in a free-flying bat. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  K. Forsman,et al.  Evidence for echolocation in the common shrew, Sorex araneus , 1988 .

[23]  E. Covey.  Neurobiological specializations in echolocating bats. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[24]  R. Patterson.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .

[26]  A. R. Palmer,et al.  British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness: Laboratory of Physiology, University of Cambridge, 22–23 September 1996 , 1997 .

[27]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[28]  C E Rice,et al.  Human Echo Perception , 1967, Science.

[29]  K. M. Dallenbach,et al.  "Facial Vision": The Perception of Obstacles by the Blind , 1944 .