Modeling of optoacoustic signal generation for high resolution near-surface imaging with experimental verification

Optoacoustic systems making use of optical detection probes are potentially advantageous over contact transducers for noncontact, noninvasive high-resolution near surface imaging applications. In this work, an interferometer is used for high-frequency optoacoustic microscopy. The limitations of this system in terms of both sensitivity and resolution are discussed. A theoretical model has been developed for two-dimensional excitation source geometries, which can be used to predict the optoacoustic signal from a target material with an arbitrary through-thickness optical absorption distribution. The model incorporates the temporal and spatial profile of the excitation laser pulse, and is used to predict the actual out-of-plane displacement at the target surface. An adaptive, photorefractive crystal-based interferometry system has been used to measure the optically induced displacement on the surface of target materials, and the results show reasonable quantitative agreement with theory. The detection system has a 200 MHz bandwidth allowing for high-resolution imaging, and the use of optical probes for both generation and detection allows for the probes to be easily co-aligned on the sample surface. Preliminary experimental results are presented demonstrating the feasibility of using all-optical optoacoustic microscopy for near surface imaging of small-scale spatial variations in optical absorption.

[1]  S L Jacques,et al.  Measurement of tissue optical properties by time-resolved detection of laser-induced transient stress. , 1997, Applied optics.

[2]  Jean-Pierre Monchalin,et al.  Detection of ultrasonic motion of a scattering surface by photorefractive InP:Fe under an applied dc field , 1997 .

[3]  Alexander A. Oraevsky,et al.  Backward mode detection of laser-induced wide-band ultrasonic transients with optoacoustic transducer , 2000 .

[4]  J. F. Power,et al.  Optical Depth Profiling of Thin Films by Impulse Mirage Effect Spectroscopy. Part I: Theory , 1994 .

[5]  James B. Spicer,et al.  Laser Ultrasonics in Finite Structures: Comprehensive Modelling with Supporting Experiment , 1991 .

[6]  F. D. de Mul,et al.  Image reconstruction for photoacoustic scanning of tissue structures. , 2000, Applied optics.

[7]  Paul C. Beard,et al.  Ultrahigh-sensitivity wideband Fabry-Perot ultrasound sensors as an alternative to piezoelectric PVDF transducers for biomedical photoacoustic detection , 2004, SPIE BiOS.

[8]  Gerald J. Diebold,et al.  PROPERTIES OF PHOTOACOUSTIC WAVES IN ONE, TWO, AND THREE DIMENSIONS , 1994 .

[10]  Geng Ku,et al.  Multiple-bandwidth photoacoustic tomography. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J.D. Hamilton,et al.  High frequency ultrasound imaging using an active optical detector , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Stefan A. Carp,et al.  Optoacoustic imaging using interferometric measurement of surface displacement , 2004 .

[13]  P C Beard Interrogation of free-space Fabry–Perot sensing interferometers by angle tuning , 2003 .

[14]  Vasan Venugopalan,et al.  Optoacoustic tomography using time-resolved interferometric detection of surface displacement. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  High frequency optoacoustic arrays using etalon detection , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  R. J. Conant,et al.  Optical and thermal parameter effects on laser‐generated ultrasound , 1990 .