Pattern of perineal tears during vaginal delivery at a public sector University Hospital of Sindh

Objective: To determine the pattern of perineal tears during vaginal delivery in a tertiary healthcare facility. Methodology: It is a descriptive study done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit-I at Liaquat University Hospital Hyderabad, Pakistan from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005. Women with full term singleton pregnancy either primi or multigravida, in active labour were selected for the study. An informed consent was taken from all the participants. Twin pregnancy and ante-partum haemorrhage were excluded Age, parity, type and degree of tear, mode of delivery, birth weight of baby, birth attendant, risk factors and complications were noted. Results: There were 2563 deliveries, 256 patients had some degree of perineal injury giving a frequency of 9.9%. Out of them, 100 patients were selected, 37(37.0%) of multiparous and 63(63.0%) of primiparous sustained some degree of perineal injury. A higher incidence of first and second degree tears were noted and incidence was found to be more when vaginal delivery was conducted without episiotomy and fetal weight was more than 4kg. However duration of labour, perineal support, presence of perineal edema and experience of the birth attendant were important risk factors. Conclusion: Obstetric perineal tears are common as depicted by the high frequency in this study. Lack of perineal care, poor socio-economic conditions, poor intra-partum care with lack of experience were found to be contributing factors in the occurrence of perineal tears.

[1]  P. Baker Operative Intervention in Obstetrics , 2011 .

[2]  M. Gissler,et al.  Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  H. Richter,et al.  Delivery Method, Anal Sphincter Tears, and Fecal Incontinence: New Information on a Persistent Problem , 2008 .

[4]  M. Kamm,et al.  Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[5]  H. Bruinse,et al.  Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  M. Krohn,et al.  Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  M. B. Brown,et al.  Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear During Vaginal Delivery , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  R. Thakar,et al.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. , 2006, Birth.

[9]  M. Gowland,et al.  Anal function following third degree tears , 2004, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[10]  D. Fenner,et al.  Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  V. Bovbjerg,et al.  Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  N. McCabe,et al.  Genital Tract Trauma , 2002 .

[13]  W. Hop,et al.  Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence , 2001, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[14]  C. Nager,et al.  Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  H. Wallenburg,et al.  Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  H. Hagberg,et al.  Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  A. Mellgren,et al.  Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.