Experiences mapping a legacy interface terminology to SNOMED CT

BackgroundSNOMED CT is being increasingly adopted as the standard clinical terminology for health care applications. Existing clinical applications that use legacy interface terminology need to migrate to the preferred SNOMED CT standard. In this paper, we describe our experience and methodology for mapping concepts from a legacy system to SNOMED CT.MethodsOur approach includes the establishment of mapping rules between terminologists and back and forth collaboration of the mapped results through one or more iterations in order to reach consensus on the final maps.ResultsWe highlight our results not only in terms of the number of matches, quality of maps, use of post-coordination, and multiple maps but also include our observations about SNOMED CT including inconsistencies, redundancies and omissions related to our legacy mapping.ConclusionOur methodology and lessons learned from this mapping exercise may be helpful to other terminologists who may be similarly challenged to migrate their legacy terminology to SNOMED CT. This mapping process and resulting discoveries about SNOMED CT may further contribute to refinement of this dynamic, clinical terminology standard.

[1]  Ronald Cornet,et al.  Usability of expressive description logics-a case study in UMLS , 2002, AMIA.

[2]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  Aligning Knowledge Sources in the UMLS: Methods, Quantitative Results, and Applications , 2004, MedInfo.

[3]  Kent A. Spackman,et al.  SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care , 1997, AMIA.

[4]  H. E. Pople,et al.  Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine , 1982 .

[5]  Barry Smith,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics Methodology article , 2005 .

[6]  HIPAA administrative simplification: standards for electronic health care claims attachments. Proposed rule. , 2005, Federal register.

[7]  H. E. Pople,et al.  Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Barry Smith,et al.  From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[9]  James J. Cimino,et al.  In defense of the Desiderata , 2005, Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

[10]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT: ability of SNOMED clinical terms to represent clinical problem lists. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  William T. Hole,et al.  Research Paper: Integrating SNOMED CT into the UMLS: An Exploration of Different Views of Synonymy and Quality of Editing , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Desiderata for a clinical terminology server , 1999, AMIA.

[13]  Peter L. Elkin,et al.  Guideline and quality indicators for development, purchase and use of controlled health vocabularies , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.