Explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated simultaneous and sequential prisoner’s dilemma game under incomplete and complete information

ABSTRACT Explaining cooperation in social dilemmas is a central issue in behavioral science, and the prisoner’s dilemma (PD) is the most frequently employed model. Theories assuming rationality and selfishness predict no cooperation in PDs of finite duration, but cooperation is frequently observed. We therefore build a model of how individuals in a finitely repeated PD with incomplete information about their partner’s preference for mutual cooperation decide about cooperation. We study cooperation in simultaneous and sequential PDs. Our model explains three behavioral regularities found in the literature: (i) the frequent cooperation in one-shot and finitely repeated N-shot games, (ii) cooperation rates declining over the course of the game, and (iii) cooperation being more frequent in the sequential PD than in the simultaneous PD.

[1]  Martin Sefton,et al.  The Sequential Prisoner's Dilemma: Evidence on Reciprocation , 2001 .

[2]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[3]  E. Ullmann-Margalit The Emergence Of Norms , 1977 .

[4]  J. Andreoni IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[5]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[6]  J. Weesie,et al.  Social Motives and Expectations in One-Shot Asymmetric Prisoner's Dilemmas , 2013 .

[7]  K. Sterelny The adapted mind , 1995 .

[8]  D. Levine Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments , 1998 .

[9]  Peter Voss,et al.  Origins of a Spontaneous Revolution: East Germany, 1989 , 1995 .

[10]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  The Social Exchange Heuristic: Managing Errors in Social Exchange , 2007 .

[11]  T. W. Ross,et al.  Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games , 1996 .

[12]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Social exchange and reciprocity: confusion or a heuristic? , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[13]  T. Palfrey,et al.  Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why? , 1997 .

[14]  K. Opp,et al.  The Origins of a Spontaneous Revolution , 1989 .

[15]  Marcel A. L. M. van Assen,et al.  Network public goods with asymmetric information about cooperation preferences and network degree , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[16]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted Mind , 1992 .

[17]  Robb Willer Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem , 2009 .

[18]  H. Gintis,et al.  Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical , 2007 .

[19]  Ben Jann,et al.  Reputation Formation and the Evolution of Cooperation in Anonymous Online Markets , 2014 .

[20]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[21]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  RECIPROCITY, TRUST, AND THE SENSE OF CONTROL , 1999 .

[22]  R. Dawes,et al.  Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross‐Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[24]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  A theory of sequential reciprocity , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  H. Nax,et al.  Interactive preferences , 2015 .

[26]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[27]  L. Felkins The Social Dilemmas , 2015 .

[28]  Armin Falk,et al.  A Theory of Reciprocity , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[29]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[30]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[31]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[32]  J. Dijkstra Explaining contributions to public goods: Formalizing the social exchange heuristic , 2012 .

[33]  Brent Simpson,et al.  Social Values, Subjective Transformations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2004 .

[34]  John H. Miller,et al.  Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental Evidence , 1993 .

[35]  Peter Ockenfels,et al.  Prisoners' dilemma as a game with incomplete information , 1990 .

[36]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[37]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[38]  A. C. Haddon Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea , 1922, Nature.

[39]  O. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 2005 .

[40]  David F. Sally Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1995 .

[41]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[42]  D. Watts Common Sense and Sociological Explanations1 , 2014, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma , 1982 .

[44]  Jacob Dijkstra,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is: Reciprocity, social preferences, trust and contributions to public goods , 2013 .

[45]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation , 2002, Neuron.

[46]  U. Liebe,et al.  A Theory of Status-Mediated Inequity Aversion , 2009 .

[47]  C. Bicchieri The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms , 2005 .

[48]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[49]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[50]  Akira Okada Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium , 2011 .

[51]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[52]  E. Bulte,et al.  Trust and cooperation: Social capital and community resource management , 2008 .