Determining the Extractive Casting Mold of Intimate Platforms through Document Theory

This paper introduces document theory as a mechanism to analyze intimate platforms as sociotechnical systems. The theory, developed in documentation studies and applied to HCI, focuses on the casting mold or how agents, through particular means and modes, produce documents that govern social relations. We studied the process of creating a profile by identifying and mapping out the fields asked among the ten most popular online dating apps in the US. By looking at dating profiles as documents and their creation as a process of documentation, we argue that the current casting mold of these intimate platforms is designed to extract profit via invisibilization of labor in digital networks leading to the emergence of a constrained rational market agent. Our study illustrates how document theory makes visible the assumptions of technological systems, calling on us to imagine alternatives beyond incremental design changes given broader structural realities of market and power.

[1]  Gunnar Hartvigsen,et al.  Document Analysis (DA) as a Sociotechnical Design Framework for HCI: A Novel Tele-psychiatric Service as a Case Study , 2013, HCI.

[2]  Marc Davis,et al.  Theoretical foundations for experiential systems design , 2003, ETP '03.

[3]  Xiao Ma,et al.  What Happens in Happn: The Warranting Powers of Location History in Online Dating , 2017, CSCW.

[4]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Document theory for the design of socio-technical systems: A document model as ontology of human expression , 2012, J. Documentation.

[5]  Tarleton Gillespie,et al.  The politics of ‘platforms’ , 2010, New Media Soc..

[6]  Hamid R. Ekbia,et al.  Social Inequality and HCI: The View from Political Economy , 2016, CHI.

[7]  Solon Barocas,et al.  Debiasing Desire , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Hamid R. Ekbia,et al.  Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism , 2017 .

[9]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  What Are Emotion Expressions For ? , 2011 .

[10]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Frustrations with Pursuing Casual Encounters through Online Dating , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Colin Fitzpatrick,et al.  Identity, identification and identifiability: the language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[12]  Shiona Chillas,et al.  The state of affairs: critical performativity and the online dating industry , 2014 .

[13]  Mara B. Adelman,et al.  Formal Intermediaries in the Marriage Market: A Typology and Review. , 1992 .

[14]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  The , 1966 .

[15]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Online Dating Coaches' User Evaluation Strategies , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Ronald E. Day,et al.  Documentarity: Evidence, Ontology, and Inscription , 2019 .

[17]  M. Ferraris Documentality Or Why Nothing Social Exists beyond the Text , 2013 .

[18]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Understanding the Role of Community in Online Dating , 2015, CHI.

[19]  Richard B. Slatcher,et al.  Online dating system design and relational decision making: Choice, algorithms, and control , 2016 .

[20]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[21]  Roderic N. Crooks The Rainbow Flag and the Green Carnation: Grindr in The Gay Village , 2013, First Monday.

[22]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating , 2010 .

[23]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Online Dating , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[24]  José van Dijck,et al.  Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content , 2009 .

[25]  Hamid R. Ekbia,et al.  Heteronomous Humans and Autonomous Agents: Toward Artificial Relational Intelligence , 2015 .

[26]  Os Keyes,et al.  Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI , 2019, CHI.

[27]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[28]  C. Newman,et al.  Just a preference: racialised language in the sex-seeking profiles of gay and bisexual men , 2012, Culture, health & sexuality.

[29]  Bernd Frohmann,et al.  Revisiting "what is a document?" , 2009, J. Documentation.

[30]  C. Newman,et al.  ‘Not everyone’s gonna like me’: Accounting for race and racism in sex and dating web services for gay and bisexual men , 2016 .

[31]  Jennifer Phegley Courtship and Marriage in Victorian England , 2011 .

[32]  Michael J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Searching for a Mate , 2012 .

[33]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Signal Appropriation of Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in Sex-Social Apps used by Gay and Bisexual Men , 2019, CHI.

[34]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Documentality Beyond Documents , 2014 .

[35]  Stephen Owen,et al.  Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy , 2017 .