Screening tools for early neuropsychological impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  T. Schweizer,et al.  Prioritization and Timing of Outcomes and Endpoints After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group , 2019, Neurocritical Care.

[3]  P. Brugger,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia on Neuropsychological Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Protocol of a Swiss Nationwide Observational Study (MoCA-DCI Study). , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[4]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Cognitive Impairment, Functional Outcome, and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[5]  W. Sorteberg,et al.  Predictors of cognitive function in the acute phase after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage , 2018, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[6]  K. Schaller,et al.  Home-Time as a Surrogate Marker for Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , 2018, Stroke.

[7]  P. Brugger,et al.  The Barrow Neurological Institute Grading Scale as a Predictor for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Data From a Nationwide Patient Registry (Swiss SOS) , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[8]  J. Sarnthein,et al.  A Patient Registry to Improve Patient Safety: Recording General Neurosurgery Complications , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  P. Brugger,et al.  Call for uniform neuropsychological assessment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Swiss recommendations , 2015, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  W. Poon,et al.  MoCA‐assessed cognitive function and excellent outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1 year , 2014, European journal of neurology.

[11]  P. Brugger,et al.  Current practice in neuropsychological outcome reporting after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage , 2013, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[12]  V. Mok,et al.  Comparison of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination in Evaluating Cognitive Domain Deficit Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  David Hasan,et al.  Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists data repository (SAHIT). , 2013, World neurosurgery.

[14]  V. Salomaa,et al.  Cause-specific mortality of 1-year survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage , 2013, Neurology.

[15]  Early MoCA-Assessed Cognitive Impairment After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Relationship to 1-Year Functional Outcome , 2013, Translational Stroke Research.

[16]  V. Mok,et al.  Evaluation of cognitive impairment by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: prevalence, risk factors and correlations with 3 month outcomes , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[17]  T. Schweizer,et al.  Mini-Mental State Examination versus Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Rapid assessment tools for cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage , 2012, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[18]  Clinical assessment of deficits after SAH: hasty neurosurgeons and accurate neurologists , 2012, Journal of Neurology.

[19]  Werner Hacke,et al.  Contemporary Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Research: Choice of Primary Outcome Measure , 2012, Stroke.

[20]  A. Algra,et al.  Long-term outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[21]  T. Schweizer,et al.  Cognitive and Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , 2010, Stroke.

[22]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Time trends in outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage , 2010, Neurology.

[23]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Improving the Reliability of Stroke Disability Grading in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice: The Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA) , 2010, Stroke.

[24]  Oliver Rivero-Arias,et al.  Burden of disease and costs of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) in the United Kingdom , 2010, Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E.

[25]  C. V. van Heugten,et al.  Prevalence and Determinants of Cognitive Complaints after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , 2010, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[26]  A. Finset,et al.  Cognitive Functioning and Health‐Related Quality of Life 1 Year After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Preoperative Comatose Patients (Hunt and Hess Grade V Patients) , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[27]  Marc Paccalin,et al.  Effects of a Physical Training Programme on Cognitive Function and Walking Efficiency in Elderly Persons with Dementia , 2010, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[28]  A. Algra,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients discharged to a nursing home after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  T. Haug.  Cognitive Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life 1 Year After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Preoperative Comatose Patients , 2010 .

[30]  Kam-Wing Ng,et al.  Improving Reliability for , 2010 .

[31]  M. Vermeulen,et al.  What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0–1 or 0–2? , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[32]  Z. Pirtošek,et al.  Long-term cognitive deficits in patients with good outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from anterior communicating artery. , 2006, Croatian medical journal.

[33]  P. Sandercock,et al.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion , 2005, The Lancet.

[34]  Dong H. Kim,et al.  Utility of Outcome Measures After Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Trial Involving 520 Patients , 2005, Stroke.

[35]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[36]  J. Gilsbach,et al.  Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[37]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[38]  G. Teasdale,et al.  A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[40]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.

[41]  Foss Mv.  MANAGEMENT OF VIRUS HEPATITIS. , 1964 .