Target Recognition via Information Aggregation Through Dempster–Shafer's Evidence Theory

In this letter, a novel classification via information aggregation through Dempster-Shafer's (DS) evidence theory has been presented to target recognition in a SAR image. Although the DS theory of evidence has been widely studied over the decades, less attention has been paid to its application for target recognition. To capture the characteristics of a SAR image, this letter exploits a new multidimensional analytic signal named monogenic signal. Since the components of the monogenic signal are of a high dimension, it is unrealistic to be directly used. To solve the problem, an intuitive idea is to derive a single feature by these components. However, this strategy usually results in some information loss. To boost the performance, this letter presents a classification framework via information aggregation. The monogenic components are individually fed into a recently developed algorithm, i.e., sparse representation-based classification, from which the residual with respect to each target class can be produced. Since the residual from a query sample reflects the distance to the manifold formed by the training samples of a certain class, it is reasonable to be used to define the probability mass. Then, the information provided by the monogenic signal can be aggregated via Dempster's rule; hence, the inference can be reached.

[1]  John Trinder,et al.  Using the Dempster-Shafer method for the fusion of LIDAR data and multi-spectral images for building detection , 2005, Inf. Fusion.

[2]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  Target Recognition in SAR Images via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Thierry Denoeux A k -Nearest Neighbor Classification Rule Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2008, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[5]  Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan,et al.  Sparse representations for automatic target classification in SAR images , 2010, 2010 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[6]  Anjan Sarkar,et al.  Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[8]  Na Wang,et al.  Sparse Representation of Monogenic Signal: With Application to Target Recognition in SAR Images , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Christine M. Netishen,et al.  Performance of a High-Resolution Polarimetric SAR Automatic Target Recognition System , 1993 .

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[12]  Michael Felsberg,et al.  The monogenic signal , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Fusion of Airborne LiDAR With Multispectral SPOT 5 Image for Enhancement of Feature Extraction Using Dempster–Shafer Theory , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Nikhil R. Pal,et al.  Land cover classification using fuzzy rules and aggregation of contextual information through evidence theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Application of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to unsupervised classification in multisource remote sensing , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Visar Berisha,et al.  Sparse Manifold Learning with Applications to SAR Image Classification , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.