Work Organization and `the Scandinavian Model'

Comparative studies of work organization indicate that learning-oriented forms are more widely applied in the Scandinavian countries than is generally the case in Europe. This is often ascribed to the cooperation between the labour market parties and the national political authorities, and the corresponding modification of market forces through welfare and employment policies. It can be argued that this interpretation is too general. An issue like work organization is not affected by the macro-political order of society alone, but also by what more specific initiatives are taken to promote organization development at the workplace level. In this article a number of bi- and tripartite efforts to promote learning-oriented forms of work organization are presented and discussed from the perspective of the question: Is there a Scandinavian model for workplace development and what are its characteristics? It is seen that while the various efforts differ widely in terms of strategy they have some elements in common, in particular the function of building trust between management and workers on the local level.

[1]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Designed for Learning: A Tale of Two Auto Plants , 2007 .

[2]  B. Gustavsen Learning Organisation and the Process of Regionalisation , 2006 .

[3]  T. Alasoini In Search of Generative Results: A New Generation of Programmes to Develop Work Organization , 2006 .

[4]  Duncan Gallie,et al.  The Quality of Working Life: Is Scandinavia Different? , 2003 .

[5]  Morten Levin,et al.  Researching enterprise development : action research on the cooperation between management and labour in Norway , 2002 .

[6]  H. Hvid Dansk arbejdspolitiks gyldne tiår , 2001 .

[7]  Bjorn Gustavsen,et al.  Creating Connectedness: The Role of Social Research in Innovation Policy , 2001, AI & SOCIETY.

[8]  Peter Hasle,et al.  The action plan against repetitive work— An industrial relation strategy for improving the working environment , 2001 .

[9]  H. Hvid,et al.  The developmental work , 2001 .

[10]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[11]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Concept-Driven Development and the Organization of the Process of Change: An evaluation of the Swedish Working Life Fund , 1996 .

[12]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[13]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Swedish Network Development for Implementing National Work Reform Strategy , 1993 .

[14]  B. Gustavsen,et al.  From Linear to Interactive Logics: Characteristics of Workplace Development as Illustrated by Projects in Large Mail Centers , 1991 .

[15]  Per H. Engelstad,et al.  The Design of Conferences and the Evolving Role of Democratic Dialogue in Changing Working Life , 1986 .

[16]  Tom Schuller Democracy at Work , 1985 .

[17]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  New Patterns of Work Reform: The Case of Norway , 1985 .

[18]  B. Gustavsen Technology and collective agreements: some recent Scandinavian developments , 1985 .

[19]  L. Davis,et al.  The quality of working life , 1976 .

[20]  Agneta Hansson,et al.  Action Research and the Challenge of Scope , 2008 .

[21]  S A Movasaghi,et al.  DIALOGUE AND DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[22]  Matti Vartiainen,et al.  The Finnish Workplace Development Programme a Small Giant?Evaluation Report , 2003 .

[23]  W. Fricke 2. Twenty Five Years of German Research and Development Programs “Humanization of Work / Work and Technology” , 2000 .

[24]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Reforming Industrial Work – Principles and realities in the planning of Volvo’s car assembly plant in Uddevalla , 1991 .

[25]  Quality of working life. , 1986, AARN news letter.

[26]  T. Sandberg Work Organization and Autonomous Groups , 1982 .