Parallel EELS elemental mapping in scanning transmission electron microscopy: use of the difference methods

2014 The feasibility to obtain semi-quantitative elemental maps with a STEM microscope from first or second difference recorded PEELS spectra is demonstrated. These methods called "FD or SD methods" have been already used for the local quantitative analysis of trace elements. It has been shown that it can be a powerful technique to overcome the problems related to the background subtraction and inhomogeneous responses of adjacent diodes in PEELS spectra and also to greatly improve the detectability of the elements. We extended this technique to create semi-quantitative multi-element maps on biological material. The experiments are done with a 300 kV STEM (C.M. 30 Philips) coupled with a GATAN PEELS and an EDAX computer. A software developed on a host computer allows the control of the STEM probe position and the acquisition of energy shifted EELS spectra for each pixel. By comparing elemental maps obtained, with the conventional method (power law background generation and subtraction above the edge), and with the difference methods we demonstrate both the validity and the advantages offered by FD and SD methods to create multielements semi-quantitative maps. Microsc. MicroanaL Microstruct. 2 (1991) ocrOBER 1991, PAGE 531

[1]  O. Krivanek,et al.  Automated processing of parallel-detection EELS data , 1991 .

[2]  G. Zanchi.  Adaptation of a magnetic filtering device on a one megavolt electron microscope , 1975 .

[3]  R. Leapman,et al.  Comparison of detection limits for EELS and EDXS , 1991 .

[4]  C Jeanguillaume,et al.  Unconventional modes for STEM imaging of biological structures. , 1984, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[5]  R. Leapman,et al.  Quantitative X-ray mapping of biological cryosections. , 1988, Ultramicroscopy.

[6]  F. Ottensmeyer.  Electron spectroscopic imaging: parallel energy filtering and microanalysis in the fixed-beam electron microscope. , 1984, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[7]  O. Krivanek,et al.  Developments in EELS instrumentation for spectroscopy and imaging , 1991 .

[8]  A V Crewe,et al.  High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. , 1983, Science.

[9]  Christian Colliex,et al.  Spectrum-image: The next step in EELS digital acquisition and processing , 1989 .

[10]  R. Leapman,et al.  Separation of overlapping core edges in electron energy loss spectra by multiple-least-squares fitting. , 1988, Ultramicroscopy.

[11]  A. Somlyo.  Compositional mapping in biology: X rays and electrons. , 1984, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[12]  C. Colliex,et al.  EELS quantification near the single-atom detection level , 1991 .

[13]  H. Shuman,et al.  Electron energy loss analysis of near-trace-element concentrations of calcium. , 1987, Ultramicroscopy.

[14]  M. Isaacson.  The microanalysis of light elements using transmitted energy loss electrons. , 1975, Ultramicroscopy.

[15]  H Shuman,et al.  Parallel recording of electron energy loss spectra. , 1981, Ultramicroscopy.

[16]  P. Trebbia,et al.  From experiment to interpretation: Confidence limits , 1989 .

[17]  C Jeanguillaume,et al.  About the use of electron energy-loss spectroscopy for chemical mapping of thin foils with high spatial resolution. , 1978, Ultramicroscopy.

[18]  C. Ahn,et al.  Parallel detection electron spectrometer using quadrupole lenses , 1987 .

[19]  R. Egerton.  Inelastic scattering of 80 keV electrons in amorphous carbon , 1975 .

[20]  H. Shuman,et al.  Elemental imaging and resolution in energy-filtered conventional electron microscopy. , 1986, Ultramicroscopy.

[21]  P. Kruit,et al.  Quantitative data processing of parallel recorded electron energy‐loss spectra with low signal to background , 1985 .