Geometric and material determinants of patterning efficiency by dielectrophoresis.

Dielectrophoretic (DEP) forces have been used extensively to manipulate, separate, and localize biological cells and bioparticles via high-gradient electric fields. However, minimization of DEP exposure time is desirable, because of possible untoward effects on cell behavior. Toward this goal, this article investigates the geometric and material determinants of particle patterning kinetics and efficiency. In particular, the time required to achieve a steady-state pattern is theoretically modeled and experimentally validated for a planar, interdigitated bar electrode array energized in a standing-wave configuration. This measure of patterning efficiency is calculated from an improved Fourier series solution of DEP force, in which realistic boundary conditions and a finite chamber height are imposed to reflect typical microfluidic applications. The chamber height, electrode spacing, and fluid viscosity and conductivity are parameters that profoundly affect patterning efficiency, and optimization can reduce electric field exposure by orders of magnitude. Modeling strategies are generalizable to arbitrary electrode design as well as to conditions where DEP force may not act alone to cause particle motion. This improved understanding of DEP patterning kinetics provides a framework for new advances in the development of DEP-based biological devices and assays with minimal perturbation of cell behavior.

[1]  H. Morgan,et al.  Ac electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures , 1998 .

[2]  Enrico Marani,et al.  Dielectrophoretic trapping of dissociated fetal cortical rat neurons , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  D S Clague,et al.  Dielectrophoretic manipulation of macromolecules: the electric field. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Masahiro Iwadare,et al.  Separation of Small Particles Suspended in Liquid by Nonuniform Traveling Field , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  A. Abbott Cell culture: Biology's new dimension , 2003, Nature.

[6]  G. Fuhr,et al.  Cultivation of cells under strong ac-electric field—differentiation between heating and trans-membrane potential effects , 1998 .

[7]  M. Ozkan,et al.  Electro-optical platform for the manipulation of live cells , 2003 .

[8]  Sangeeta N. Bhatia,et al.  Dielectrophoretic cell patterning within tissue engineering scaffolds , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  Ronald Pethig,et al.  Selective dielectrophoretic confinement of bioparticles in potential energy wells , 1993 .

[10]  I. Lundström,et al.  Microrobots for micrometer-size objects in aqueous media: potential tools for single-cell manipulation. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Michael P. Hughes,et al.  Nanoelectromechanics in Engineering and Biology , 2002 .

[12]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  A microfabrication-based dynamic array cytometer. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Terri Adams,et al.  Streamlining the Drug Discovery Process by Integrating Miniaturization, High Throughput Screening, High Content Screening, and Automation on the CellChip™ System , 1999 .

[14]  S. Ueno,et al.  Magnetophoresis of diamagnetic cells and microorganisms in a culture medium , 2001 .

[15]  David Leith,et al.  Drag force on agglomerated spheres in creeping flow , 1989 .

[16]  Mina J Bissell,et al.  Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  Andreas Acrivos,et al.  Particle motions and segregation in dielectrophoretic microfluidics , 2003 .

[18]  J. Gillis,et al.  Mixed boundary value problems in potential theory , 1966 .

[19]  M. Toner,et al.  Microengineering of cellular interactions. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  Dong Eui Chang,et al.  Closed-form solutions in the electrical field analysis for dielectrophoretic and travelling wave inter-digitated electrode arrays , 2003 .

[21]  J. Happel,et al.  Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media , 1973 .

[22]  J. Voldman,et al.  Holding forces of single-particle dielectrophoretic traps. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[23]  J. Elisseeff,et al.  Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  G. Fuhr,et al.  Three-dimensional electric field traps for manipulation of cells--calculation and experimental verification. , 1993, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  Tomokazu Matsue,et al.  Rapid micropatterning of living cells by repulsive dielectrophoretic force , 1997 .

[26]  Ulrich Zimmermann,et al.  Electro-rotation: development of a technique for dielectric measurements on individual cells and particles , 1988 .

[27]  Hiroyuki Fujita,et al.  Positioning living cells on a high-density electrode array by negative dielectrophoresis , 2003 .

[28]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—I Motion through a quiescent fluid , 1967 .

[29]  A. Acrivos,et al.  Particle segregation in suspensions subject to high-gradient ac electric fields , 2000 .

[30]  H. A. Pohl,et al.  Dielectrophoresis: The Behavior of Neutral Matter in Nonuniform Electric Fields , 1978 .

[31]  N. G. Greena,et al.  Numerical solution of the dielectrophoretic and travelling wave forces for interdigitated electrode arrays using the finite element method , 2002 .

[32]  Thomas B. Jones,et al.  Electromechanics of Particles , 1995 .

[33]  A. Acrivos,et al.  Positive dielectrophoresis and heterogeneous aggregation in high-gradient ac electric fields , 2002 .

[34]  J. Wu,et al.  Acoustical tweezers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  H. Morgan,et al.  The dielectrophoretic and travelling wave forces generated by interdigitated electrode arrays: analytical solution using Fourier series , 2001 .

[36]  P. Benya,et al.  Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels , 1982, Cell.

[37]  H. Keh,et al.  Slow motion of a droplet between two parallel plane walls , 2001 .

[38]  Peter R. C. Gascoyne,et al.  A theoretical method of electrical field analysis for dielectrophoretic electrode arrays using Green's theorem , 1996 .

[39]  A. D. Jenkins,et al.  Properties of liquids and solutions , 1982 .

[40]  S. Britland,et al.  Cell reactions to dielectrophoretic manipulation. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[41]  Torsten Müller,et al.  The influence of higher moments on particle behaviour in dielectrophoretic field cages , 1999 .

[42]  Nicolas Kalogerakis,et al.  Dielectrophoretic forces can be safely used to retain viable cells in perfusion cultures of animal cells , 1999, Cytotechnology.

[43]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  Zerner Neuere Methoden und Ergebnisse in der Hydrodynamik , 1928 .

[45]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[46]  J. Voldman,et al.  Dielectrophoretic registration of living cells to a microelectrode array. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[47]  M. Heller,et al.  Electric manipulation of bioparticles and macromolecules on microfabricated electrodes. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[48]  P. Gascoyne,et al.  Particle separation by dielectrophoresis , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[49]  A. Ashkin,et al.  Optical trapping and manipulation of neutral particles using lasers. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Tissue Engineering at the Micro-Scale , 1999 .