HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES. I. USING THE FLURY HIERARCHY

The comparison of additive genetic variance‐covariance matrices (G‐matrices) is an increasingly popular exercise in evolutionary biology because the evolution of the G‐matrix is central to the issue of persistence of genetic constraints and to the use of dynamic models in an evolutionary time frame. The comparison of G‐matrices is a nontrivial statistical problem because family structure induces nonindependence among the elements in each matrix. Past solutions to the problem of G‐matrix comparison have dealt with this problem, with varying success, but have tested a single null hypothesis (matrix equality or matrix dissimilarity). Because matrices can differ in many ways, several hypotheses are of interest in matrix comparisons. Flury (1988) has provided an approach to matrix comparison in which a variety of hypotheses are tested, including the two extreme hypotheses prevalent in the evolutionary literature. The hypotheses are arranged in a hierarchy and involve comparisons of both the principal components (eigenvectors) and eigenvalues of the matrix. We adapt Flury's hierarchy of tests to the problem of comparing G‐matrices by using randomization testing to account for nonindependence induced by family structure. Software has been developed for carrying out this analysis for both genetic and phenotypic data. The method is illustrated with a garter snake test case.

[1]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[2]  S. J. Arnold.  Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Joe C. Campbell,et al.  Developmental Constraints and Evolution: A Perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on Development and Evolution , 1985, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[5]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES. II COASTAL‐INLAND DIVERGENCE IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  N. Campbell.  Graphical Comparison of Covariance Matrices , 1981 .

[7]  R. Shaw.  THE COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN POPULATIONS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[9]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  Static, Ontogenetic, and Evolutionary Allometry: A Multivariate Comparison in Nine Species of Water Striders , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  B. Flury.  A Hierarchy of Relationships Between Covariance Matrices , 1987 .

[12]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  A Bootstrap Comparison of Genetic Covariance Matrices , 1997 .

[13]  D. Boos,et al.  Testing hypotheses about covariance matrices using bootstrap methods , 1993 .

[14]  S. Via.  THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF POLYPHAGY IN AN INSECT HERBIVORE. II. GENETIC CORRELATIONS IN LARVAL PERFORMANCE WITHIN AND AMONG HOST PLANTS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  S. Steppan,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PHENOTYPIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE. I. CONTRASTING RESULTS FROM MATRIX CORRELATION AND COMMON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSES , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Susan M. Paulsen.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF THE WING COLOR PATTERN IN THE BUCKEYE BUTTERFLY (PRECIS COENIA AND PRECIS EVARETE): EVIDENCE AGAINST THE CONSTANCY OF G , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  B. Flury,et al.  An application of common principal component analysis to cranial morphometry of Microtus californicus and M. ochrogaster(Mammalia, Rodentia) , 1988 .

[19]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[20]  W. Atchley,et al.  HOW SIMILAR ARE GENETIC CORRELATION STRUCTURES? DATA FROM MICE AND RATS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Beat Neuenschwander,et al.  Common canonical variates , 1995 .

[22]  Beat Neuenschwander,et al.  Common Principal Components for Dependent Random Vectors , 2000 .

[23]  COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS: REPLY TO COWLEY AND ATCHLEY , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  P. Phillips.  DESIGNING EXPERIMENTS TO MAXIMIZE THE POWER OF DETECTING CORRELATIONS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  R. Lande,et al.  GENOTYPE‐ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  W. Krzanowski.  Between-Groups Comparison of Principal Components , 1979 .

[27]  D. Lofsvold,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. I. TESTS OF THE HOMOGENEITY OF GENETIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE AMONG SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  B. Flury.  On Sums of Random Variables and Independence , 1986 .

[29]  Z. Zeng.  LONG‐TERM CORRELATED RESPONSE, INTERPOPULATION COVARIATION, AND INTERSPECIFIC ALLOMETRY , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  R. Shaw.  MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD APPROACHES APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Wojtek J. Krzanowski.  Rao's Distance Between Normal Populations That Have Common Principal Components , 1996 .

[33]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  W. Atchley,et al.  COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices , 1978 .

[36]  W. Atchley.  DEVELOPMENTAL QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENIES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  J. Cheverud.  PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  M. Turelli.  PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, CONSTANT COVARIANCES, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ADDITIVE VARIANCE , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  W. Atchley,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE‐SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  Bernhard W. Flury,et al.  Quadratic discriminant functions with constraints on the covariance matrices: some asymptotic results , 1992 .

[41]  T. W. Anderson.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[42]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Modification of Estimates of Parameters in the Construction of Genetic Selection Indices ('Bending') , 1981 .

[43]  Conor V. Dolan,et al.  Principal component analysis using LISREL 8 , 1996 .

[44]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[45]  Dennis D. Boos,et al.  Bootstrap Critical Values for Testing Homogeneity of Covariance Matrices , 1992 .

[46]  D. Lofsvold,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. II. ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND DRIFT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  B. Flury.  Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[48]  HETEROCHRONY AND ALLOMETRY: LESSONS FROM THE WATER STRIDER GENUS LIMNOPORUS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  Richard Preziosi,et al.  The estimation of the genetic correlation: the use of the jackknife , 1994, Heredity.

[50]  R. Lande.  QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  Beat Neuenschwander,et al.  Ontogeny and Individual Variation: Analysis of Patterned Covariance Matrices with Common Principal Components , 1996 .