Overview of the Components Used in Active and Passive Lower-Limb Prosthetic Devices
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K Yiğiter,et al. Comparison of the effects of patellar tendon bearing and total surface bearing sockets on prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation , 2002, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[2] Joan E Sanders,et al. Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.
[3] G. Street,et al. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[4] M. Goldfarb,et al. Control of Stair Ascent and Descent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[5] Malte Bellmann,et al. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[6] Martin Seyr,et al. Activities of Daily Living: Genium Bionic Prosthetic Knee Compared with C-Leg , 2013 .
[7] J. Sanders,et al. Effects of Fluid Insert Volume Changes on Socket Pressures and Shear Stresses: Case Studies from two Trans-Tibial Amputee Subjects , 2006, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[8] Thomas G. Sugar,et al. An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration , 2010 .
[9] Thomas G. Sugar,et al. Bionic Running for Unilateral Transtibial Military Amputees , 2010 .
[10] Thomas Schmalz,et al. The Safety of C-Leg: Biomechanical Tests , 2009 .
[11] S. Collins,et al. Recycling Energy to Restore Impaired Ankle Function during Human Walking , 2010, PloS one.
[12] S. Wolf,et al. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.
[13] S. Gard,et al. The Influence of Four‐Bar Linkage Knees on Prosthetic Swing‐Phase Floor Clearance , 1996 .
[14] L. E. Holt,et al. A comparison of the SACH and single axis foot in the gait of unilateral below-knee amputees , 1983, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[15] Hugh M. Herr,et al. Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.
[16] R G Redhead,et al. Total surface bearing self suspending above-knee sockets∗ , 1979, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[17] K. Hagberg,et al. Osseointegrated Titanium Implants for Limb Prostheses Attachments: Infectious Complications , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[18] H. Herr,et al. A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[19] J. Bussmann,et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcome and cost efficiency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in transtibial amputees. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[20] K. Hagberg,et al. One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[21] Kenton R Kaufman,et al. Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[22] Joan E. Sanders,et al. Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: Case study results using bioimpedance analysis , 2011 .
[23] C W Radcliffe. Four-bar linkage prosthetic knee mechanisms: Kinematics, alignment and prescription criteria , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[24] Kinley Larntz,et al. Perceived Stability, Function, and Satisfaction Among Transfemoral Amputees Using Microprocessor and Nonmicroprocessor Controlled Prosthetic Knees: A Multicenter Survey , 2009 .
[25] S. Collins,et al. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation. , 2012, Human movement science.
[26] T. Schmalz,et al. Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. , 2002, Gait & posture.
[27] Richard M. Greenwald,et al. Volume Management: Smart Variable Geometry Socket (SVGS) Technology for Lower-Limb Prostheses , 2003 .
[28] J H Zettl,et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the VA Seattle foot. , 1985, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[29] Charles H. Pritham,et al. Evolution and Development of the Silicone Suction Socket (3S) for Below-Knee Prostheses , 1989 .
[30] Alena M. Grabowski,et al. Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[31] J E Sanders,et al. Mechanical performance of inflatable inserts used in limb prosthetics. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[32] T. Nosaka,et al. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: A comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[33] Tracy L Beil,et al. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[34] Rajiv Dubey,et al. Kinetic Differences Using a Power Knee and C-Leg While Sitting Down and Standing Up: A Case Report , 2010 .
[35] C. Pritham,et al. Biomechanics and shape of the above-knee socket considered in light of the ischial containment concept , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[36] M. Lilja,et al. Movement of the tibial end in a PTB prosthesis socket: A sagittal X-ray study of the PTB prosthesis , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[37] H.A. Varol,et al. Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.
[38] Koichi Shinkoda,et al. Hygiene problems of residual limb and silicone liners in transtibial amputees wearing the total surface bearing socket. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[39] Alena M. Grabowski,et al. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
[40] S. Wolf,et al. Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system. , 2010, Gait & posture.
[41] Michael Goldfarb,et al. Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[42] Radcliffe Cw,et al. Functional considerations in the fitting of above-knee prostheses. , 1955 .
[43] Amit Gefen,et al. Outdoor dynamic subject-specific evaluation of internal stresses in the residual limb: hydraulic energy-stored prosthetic foot compared to conventional energy-stored prosthetic feet. , 2012, Gait & posture.
[44] H. Ogata,et al. Total surface bearing below-knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[45] J. Czerniecki,et al. Comparison of the Power Knee and C-Leg during step-up and sit-to-stand tasks. , 2013, Gait & Posture.
[46] Imad Sedki,et al. Patient evaluation of the Echelon foot using the Seattle Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire , 2013, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[47] Ö. Kristinsson,et al. The ICEROSS concept: A discussion of a philosophy , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.