CON4EI: Development of testing strategies for hazard identification and labelling for serious eye damage and eye irritation of chemicals.

Assessment of acute eye irritation potential is part of the international regulatory requirements for safety testing of chemicals. In the last decades, many efforts have been made in the search for alternative methods to replace the regulatory in vivo Draize rabbit eye test (OECD TG 405). Success in terms of complete replacement of the regulatory in vivo Draize rabbit eye test has not yet been achieved. The main objective of the CEFIC-LRI-AIMT6-VITO CON4EI (CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy) project was to develop tiered testing strategies for serious eye damage and eye irritation assessment that can lead to complete replacement of OECD TG 405. A set of 80 reference chemicals (e.g. balanced by important driver of classification and physical state), was tested with seven test methods. Based on the results of this project, three different strategies were suggested. We have provided a standalone (EpiOcular ET-50), a two-tiered and three-tiered strategy, that can be used to distinguish between Cat 1 and Cat 2 chemicals and chemicals that do not require classification (No Cat). The two-tiered and three-tiered strategies use an RhCE test method (EpiOcular EIT or SkinEthic™ EIT) at the bottom (identification No Cat) in combination with the BCOP LLBO (two-tiered strategy) or BCOP OP-KIT and SMI (three-tiered strategy) at the top (identification Cat 1). For our proposed strategies, 71.1% - 82.9% Cat 1, 64.2% - 68.5% Cat 2 and ≥80% No Cat chemicals were correctly identified. Also, similar results were obtained for the Top-Down and Bottom-Up approach.

[1]  N. Alépée,et al.  CON4EI: Selection of the reference chemicals for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals. , 2017, Toxicology in Vitro.

[2]  Marco Corvaro,et al.  Tiered application of the neutral red release and EpiOcular™ assays for evaluating the eye irritation potential of agrochemical formulations. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. , 2010, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[4]  Sandra Verstraelen,et al.  CON4EI: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals. , 2017, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[5]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Analysis of Draize Eye Irritation Testing and its Prediction by Mining Publicly Available 2008–2014 REACH Data , 2016, ALTEX.

[6]  J. Jester Extent of Corneal Injury as a Biomarker for Hazard Assessment and the Development of Alternative Models to the Draize Rabbit Eye Test , 2006, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[7]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[8]  Yutaka Takahashi,et al.  A tiered approach combining the short time exposure (STE) test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals. , 2012, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[9]  M K Prinsen,et al.  The Draize Eye Test and in vitro alternatives; a left-handed marriage? , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[10]  Sandra Verstraelen,et al.  Improvement of the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[11]  James V Jester,et al.  Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. , 2002, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[13]  W M Petroll,et al.  Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  In-house Validation of the EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test and its Combination with the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test for the Assessment of Ocular Irritation , 2011, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[16]  Annette Mehling,et al.  Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS). , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[17]  山上 鋭享 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) 化学品の分類および表示に関する世界調和システム , 2007 .

[18]  N. Alépée,et al.  CON4EI: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (EpiOcular™ EIT) for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals. , 2017, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[19]  N. Alépée,et al.  CON4EI: SkinEthic™ Human Corneal Epithelium Eye Irritation Test (SkinEthic™ HCE EIT) for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals. , 2017, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[20]  N. Alépée,et al.  Multi-laboratory evaluation of SkinEthic HCE test method for testing serious eye damage/eye irritation using solid chemicals and overall performance of the test method with regard to solid and liquid chemicals testing. , 2016, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[21]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[22]  Yutaka Takahashi,et al.  Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances. , 2012, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[23]  Mitchell Klausner,et al.  The EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification and Labelling of Eye Irritating Chemicals: Protocol Optimisation for Solid Materials and the Results after Extended Shipment , 2015, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[24]  João Barroso,et al.  Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD) , 2016, Archives of Toxicology.