Hybrid data-driven physics-based model fusion framework for tool wear prediction

An integral part of modern manufacturing process management is to acquire useful information from machining processes to monitor machine and tool condition. Various models have been introduced to detect, classify, and predict tool wear, as a key parameter of the machining process. In more recent developments, sensor-based approaches have been attempted to infer the tool wear condition from real-time processing of the measurement data. Experiments show that the physics-based prediction models can include large uncertainties. Likewise, the measurement-based (or sensor-based) inference techniques are affected by sensor noise and measurement model uncertainties. To manage uncertainties and noise of both methods, a hybrid framework is proposed to fuse together the results of the prediction model and the measurement-based inference data in a stepwise manner. The fusion framework is an extension to the regularized particle filtering technique, used to facilitate updating the state prediction with a numerical inference model, when measurement models alone are not satisfactory. The results show significant improvement in tool wear state estimation, reducing the prediction errors by almost half, compared to the prediction model and sensor-based monitoring method used independently.

[1]  Richard Colbaugh,et al.  Real-time tool wear estimation using recurrent neural networks , 1995, Proceedings of Tenth International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[2]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Tool life prediction for sustainable manufacturing , 2013 .

[3]  Yaguo Lei,et al.  Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction , 2018 .

[4]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Stochastic Tool Wear Prediction for Sustainable Manufacturing , 2016 .

[5]  Christian Musso,et al.  Improving Regularised Particle Filters , 2001, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice.

[6]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  DYNAMIC STATE MODEL FOR ON-LINE TOOL WEAR ESTIMATION IN TURNING. , 1987 .

[7]  Steven R Schmid Kalpakjian,et al.  Manufacturing Engineering and Technology , 1991 .

[8]  Greg Welch,et al.  An Introduction to Kalman Filter , 1995, SIGGRAPH 2001.

[9]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[10]  Aldo Attanasio,et al.  3D finite element analysis of tool wear in machining , 2008 .

[11]  S. Li,et al.  Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining by Fuzzy Neural Networks , 1996 .

[12]  Ren Jie Kuo,et al.  Multi-sensor integration for on-line tool wear estimation through artificial neural networks and fuz , 2000 .

[13]  Ying Chen,et al.  Sequential state estimation of nonlinear/non-Gaussian systems with stochastic input for turbine degradation estimation , 2016 .

[14]  XiaoQi Chen,et al.  Development of a tool wear observer model for online tool condition monitoring and control in machining nickel-based alloys , 2009 .

[15]  Bernhard Sick,et al.  ON-LINE AND INDIRECT TOOL WEAR MONITORING IN TURNING WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: A REVIEW OF MORE THAN A DECADE OF RESEARCH , 2002 .

[16]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[17]  Tilak Raj,et al.  Tool life management of unmanned production system based on surface roughness by ANFIS , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[18]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Estimation of tool wear in orthogonal cutting using the finite element analysis , 2004 .

[19]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[20]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Analysis of Tool Wear—Part I: Theoretical Models of Flank Wear , 1969 .

[21]  Xuefeng Chen,et al.  The concept and progress of intelligent spindles: A review , 2017 .

[22]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Enhanced particle filter for tool wear prediction , 2015 .

[23]  Soumitra Paul,et al.  Fuzzy controlled backpropagation neural network for tool condition monitoring in face milling , 2000 .

[24]  Jing Liu,et al.  An improved analytical model for a lubricated roller bearing including a localized defect with different edge shapes , 2018 .

[25]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression , 2015, J. Intell. Manuf..

[26]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  A Novel Local Time-Frequency Domain Feature Extraction Method for Tool Condition Monitoring Using S-Transform and Genetic Algorithm , 2014 .

[27]  Ö. Eker,et al.  Major challenges in prognostics: study on benchmarking prognostic datasets , 2012 .

[28]  Jie Liu,et al.  State Estimation for General Class of Dynamical Systems: An Extension to Particle Filters , 2016 .

[29]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[30]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction , 2017, J. Comput. Sci..

[31]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Adaptive resampling-based particle filtering for tool life prediction , 2015 .

[32]  Erich Müller,et al.  Der Verschleiss von Hartmetallwerkzeugen und seine kurzzeitige Ermittlung , 1962 .

[33]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Deep Learning and Its Applications to Machine Health Monitoring: A Survey , 2016, ArXiv.

[34]  David Dornfeld,et al.  A study of tool wear using statistical analysis of metal-cutting acoustic emission , 1982 .

[35]  Lovekesh Vig,et al.  Multi-Sensor Prognostics using an Unsupervised Health Index based on LSTM Encoder-Decoder , 2016, ArXiv.

[36]  Amiya R Mohanty,et al.  Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion , 2007 .

[37]  Z. Pálmai,et al.  Proposal for a new theoretical model of the cutting tool's flank wear , 2013 .

[38]  Rodolfo E. Haber,et al.  Tool wear monitoring using neuro-fuzzy techniques: a comparative study in a turning process , 2010, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.