Both-column Acetabular Fractures with Posterior Wall Involved can be Managed through Single Anterior Approach by Evaluation of Computer-assisted Virtual Surgery Technique.

OBJECTIVE Posterior wall (PW) fractures were sometimes associated in both-column acetabular fractures. How to evaluate pre-operatively the necessity for the performance of the posterior approach was an issue to be solved. In order to solve this issue, the computer-assisted virtual surgery technique was used to evaluate if the involved PW in both-column acetabular fractures (BACF) should be managed through posterior approach and verify the feasibility of this method. METHODS Data of a consecutive cohort of 72 patients with both-acetabular fractures from January 2012 to January 2020 was collected for retrospective study, of which 44 patients had concomitant acetabular PW fractures, and patients without PW fractures were labeled as the BCAF group. Computer-assisted virtual surgery technique was performed pre-operatively to evaluate the necessity for performance of posterior approach in 44 patients, and posterior approach was required if more than 3 mm of displacement was still present in the reduced 3D model. The 23 patients without treatment through posterior approach were labeled as the BCAF-PW- group, and the 21 patients with treatment through posterior approach were labeled as the BCAF-PW+ group. Operation-related and post-operative parameters were recorded. The quality of reduction and functional outcomes were assessed by the Matta scoring system and modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system. The measurement data were analyzed using the t-test of independent samples and rank-sum test of ranked data between every two groups. Also, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data between the three groups. RESULTS Comparing operation-related and post-operative parameters in the three groups, some PW fractures in both-column acetabular fractures could be ignored, and which could be evaluated pre-operatively for necessity of an additional posterior approach. Operative time (271.2 ± 32.8 mins) and intra-operative blood loss (1176.7 ± 211.1 mL) were significantly higher in the BCAF-PW+ group. The excellent/good of reduction (25/28 of the BCAF group, 21/23 of the BCAF-PW- group, 19/21 of the BCAF-PW+ group) and functional outcomes (24/28 of the BCAF group, 18/23 of the BCAF-PW- group, 18/21 of the BCAF-PW+ group) of three groups were similar. The incidence of complications, such as deep vein thrombosis (4/28 of the BCAF group >3/23 of the BCAF-PW- group >1/21 of the BCAF-PW+ group) and injury of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (3/23 of the BCAF-PW- group >2/28 of the BCAF group >0/21 of the BCAF-PW+ group), was no significant difference. CONCLUSION The partial both-column acetabular fractures with PW involvement could be managed through a single anterior approach without another posterior approach by evaluation of computer-assisted virtual surgery technique.

[1]  Yan Ma,et al.  Both‐Column Acetabular Fractures: Should Pelvic Ring Reduction or Acetabulum be Performed First? , 2022, Orthopaedic surgery.

[2]  Jianfei Tang,et al.  Three-dimensional morphological analysis of quadrilateral plate fragments in associated both-column acetabular fractures , 2022, Skeletal Radiology.

[3]  Xianhua Cai,et al.  Morphological Asymmetry of Pelvic Rings: A Study Based on Three‐Dimensional Deviation Analysis , 2022, Orthopaedic surgery.

[4]  Y. Zhan,et al.  Intra-articular fragment mapping in associated both-column acetabular fractures , 2022, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  M. Domzalski,et al.  Ligamentum teres reconstruction with labrum and capsule repair after posterior acetabular wall fracture: a case report , 2021, Journal of hip preservation surgery.

[6]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Size and location of posterior wall fragment on CT can predict hip instability in a cadaveric model. , 2021, Injury.

[7]  E. Rath,et al.  The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review , 2021, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[8]  M. Gardner,et al.  Management of the posterior wall fracture in associated both column fractures of the acetabulum , 2021, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[9]  H. Vallier,et al.  Factors influencing functional outcomes following open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures. , 2020, Injury.

[10]  Seung-Beom Han,et al.  Posterior wall fractures associated with both-column acetabular fractures can be skilfully ignored. , 2020, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[11]  U. Meena,et al.  Can patients with complex acetabular fractures be operated by combined anterior and posterior approaches in a single anesthetic sitting? , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[12]  Ting-fang Sun,et al.  Application of computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and three-dimensional printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates in bicolumnar acetabular fracture fixation. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[13]  J. P. van der List,et al.  Assessing Postoperative Reduction After Acetabular Fracture Surgery: A Standardized Digital Computed Tomography–Based Method , 2018, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[14]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  The Kocher-Langenbeck Approach: State of the Art , 2018, JBJS essential surgical techniques.

[15]  Kun Zhang,et al.  Post wall fixation by lag screw only in associated both column fractures with posterior wall involvement. , 2017, Injury.

[16]  V. Giordano,et al.  Marginal impaction in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  H. Y. Kim,et al.  Modified Stoppa Approach for Surgical Treatment of Acetabular Fracture , 2015, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[18]  C. Krettek,et al.  Both column fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term-results. , 2012, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[19]  B. Moed,et al.  Computed Tomography as a Predictor of Hip Stability Status in Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  R. M. D'aubigne,et al.  The Classic: Functional Results of Hip Arthroplasty with Acrylic Prosthesis , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  E. Letournel Acetabulum fractures: classification and management , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  J L Marsh,et al.  Clinical failure after posterior wall acetabular fractures: the influence of initial fracture patterns. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[23]  J. Matta Fractures of the Acetabulum: Accuracy of Reduction and Clinical Results in Patients Managed Operatively within Three Weeks after the Injury* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  A. Moroni,et al.  Surgical treatment of both-column fractures by staged combined ilioinguinal and Kocher-Langenbeck approaches. , 1995, Injury.

[25]  W. B. Guilford,et al.  Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  G. Zych,et al.  Computed tomography evaluation of stability in posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  E. Letournel,et al.  Acetabulum fractures: classification and management , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.