Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model

The biomechanical influence of thoraco-lumbo-sacral bracing, a commonly employed treatment in scoliosis, is still not fully understood. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate corrections generated by different virtual braces using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM) and to analyze the most influential design factors. The 3D geometry of three patients presenting different types of curves was acquired with a multi-view X-ray technique and surface topography. A personalized FEM of the patients’ trunk and a parametric model of a virtual custom-fit brace were then created. The installation of the braces on the patients was simulated. The influence of 15 design factors on the 3D correction generated by the brace was evaluated following a design of experiments simulation protocol allowing computing the main and two-way interaction effects of the design factors. A total of 12,288 different braces were tested. Results showed a great variability of the braces effectiveness. Of the 15 design factors investigated, according to the 2 modalities chosen for each one, the 5 most influential design factors were the position of the brace opening (posterior vs. anterior), the strap tension, the trochanter extension side, the lordosis design and the rigid shell shape. The position of the brace opening modified the correction mechanism. The trochanter extension position influenced the efficiency of the thoracic and lumbar pads by modifying their lever arm. Increasing the strap tension improved corrections of coronal curves. The lordosis design had an influence in the sagittal plane but not in the coronal plane. This study could help to better understand the brace biomechanics and to rationalize and optimize their design.

[1]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  The 2 k—p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I , 2000, Technometrics.

[2]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Virtual prototyping of a brace design for the correction of scoliotic deformities , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  The 2 k — p Fractional Factorial Designs , 1961 .

[4]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Use of the Milwaukee Brace for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  S Negrini,et al.  'SOSORT consensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction (investigating the rationale for force vector selection)' , 2006, Scoliosis.

[6]  J. Leong,et al.  New Prognostic Factors to Predict the Final Outcome of Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[7]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  H Labelle,et al.  A new X-ray calibration/reconstruction system for 3D clinical assessment of spinal deformities. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[9]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Clinical and biomechanical evaluations of coupling mechanisms between the spine and rib cage in orthotic treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 1996 .

[10]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  A 3D visualization tool for the design and customization of spinal braces , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[13]  J. Stuart Hunter,et al.  The 2 k—p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  Delphine Périé,et al.  Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  3D reconstruction and analysis of the whole trunk surface for non-invasive follow-up of scoliotic deformities. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[16]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  D. Gardner-Bonneau,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Non-Operative Treatments for Idiopathic Scoliosis*† , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  E. Fogarty,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Effect of Brace Treatment on the Incidence of Surgery , 2001, Spine.

[19]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[21]  A B Schultz,et al.  Optimization of skeletal configuration: studies of scoliosis correction biomechanics. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  M. Lacroix,et al.  Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  A B Schultz,et al.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  H. Labelle,et al.  Patient-specific mechanical properties of a flexible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[25]  F Lavaste,et al.  [Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method]. , 1995, Annales de chirurgie.

[26]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[27]  M. Berger,et al.  Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[28]  F. Castro,et al.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the Hueter-Volkmann principle. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Scoliotic Spine and Pelvis From Uncalibrated Biplanar x-Ray Images , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[30]  R Vanderby,et al.  A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  H Labelle,et al.  Rib Cage‐Spine Coupling Patterns Involved in Brace Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[32]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Boston Brace System for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Relationship between Strap Tension and Brace Interface Forces , 2004, Spine.

[33]  A. Kaelin,et al.  The Boston Bracing System for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Follow-up Results in 295 Patients , 1986, Spine.