Combination therapy with cyclosporine and methotrexate in severe rheumatoid arthritis. The Methotrexate-Cyclosporine Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND Patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis who are treated with methotrexate frequently have only partial improvement. METHODS In a six-month randomized, double-blind trial, we compared combination therapy with cyclosporine (2.5 to 5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day in two divided doses at 12-hour intervals) and methotrexate (at the maximal tolerated dose) with methotrexate and placebo in 148 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had residual inflammation and disability despite partial but substantial responses to prior methotrexate treatment. The primary outcome measure was the change in the number of tender joints. RESULTS The mean (+/- SD) dose of cyclosporine at the final treatment was 2.97 +/- 1.02 mg per kilogram per day. As compared with the placebo group, the patients in the treatment group had a net improvement in the tender-joint count of 25 percent, or 4.8 joints (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 8.9; P = 0.02), and in the swollen-joint count of 25 percent, or 3.8 joints (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 6.3; P = 0.005); improvement in overall disease activity as assessed by the physician (19 percent, P < 0.001) and the patient (21 percent, P < 0.001); and improvement in joint pain (23 percent, P = 0.04) and in the degree of disability (26 percent, P < 0.001). The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate increased by 4.2 mm per hour in the cyclosporine group and decreased by 4.8 mm per hour in the placebo group (P = 0.006). Thirty-six patients (48 percent) in the cyclosporine group and 12 patients (16 percent) in the placebo group (P < 0.001) met the 1993 criteria for improvement of the American College of Rheumatology (more than 20 percent improvement in the numbers of both swollen and tender joints and improvement in three of five other variables). Seventeen patients in the cyclosporine group and 12 patients in the placebo group were withdrawn from the study; 2 patients in the cyclosporine group died, 1 from viral pneumonia and the other in a motor vehicle accident. Serum creatinine concentrations increased by a mean of 0.14 +/- 0.27 mg per deciliter (12 +/- 24 mmol per liter) in the cyclosporine group and by 0.05 +/- 0.19 mg per deciliter (4 +/- 17 mmol per liter) in the placebo group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In a six-month study, patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis and only partial responses to methotrexate had clinically important improvement after combination therapy with cyclosporine and methotrexate. Side effects were not substantially increased. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with this combination is needed.

[1]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Combination therapy of cyclosporine with methotrexate and gold in rheumatoid arthritis (2 pilot studies). , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  D. Felson,et al.  The efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A meta-analysis. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  J. Klippel,et al.  Second-line drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  T. Pincus,et al.  Prediction of Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis according to Simple Questionnaire and Joint Count Measures , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  A. Dickens,et al.  The European Commission and health care. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[6]  J J Anderson,et al.  The American college of rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials , 1993 .

[7]  F. Arellano,et al.  Malignancies in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with cyclosporin A. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[8]  P. Wells Manipulative treatment of the spine. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[9]  D. Scott,et al.  Antirheumatic drugs: a proposed new classification. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Cyclosporin A in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of efficacy. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[11]  T. Pincus,et al.  What is the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis? , 1993, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[12]  G. Panayi,et al.  Renal morphology after cyclosporin A therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients. International Kidney Biopsy Registry of Cyclosporin (Sandimmun) in Autoimmune Diseases. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[13]  T. Pincus,et al.  Longterm drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in seven rheumatology private practices: II. Second line drugs and prednisone. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  M. Urowitz,et al.  Comparison of azathioprine, methotrexate, and the combination of both in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis , 1992 .

[15]  M. Urowitz,et al.  Comparison of azathioprine, methotrexate, and the combination of both in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled clinical trial. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  E. Brahn,et al.  Suppression of collagen-induced arthritis by combination cyclosporin A and methotrexate therapy. , 1991, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  M. Newkirk,et al.  Complications of immunosuppression associated with weekly low dose methotrexate. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology.

[18]  T. Pincus,et al.  Remodeling the pyramid or remodeling the paradigms concerning rheumatoid arthritis--lessons from Hodgkin's disease and coronary artery disease. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Remodelling the pyramid: the therapeutic target of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  F. Wolfe,et al.  Termination of slow acting antirheumatic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a 14-year prospective evaluation of 1017 consecutive starts. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[21]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Low-dose cyclosporin versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 1990, The Lancet.

[22]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[23]  H. Paulus,et al.  The use of combinations of disease-modifying antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  L. A. Healey,et al.  Remodeling the pyramid--a concept whose time has come. , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[25]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Indications, Contraindications, Efficacy, and Safety , 1987 .

[27]  T. J. Breen,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[28]  R. Palacios Cyclosporin A inhibits antigen‐ and lectin‐induced but not constitutive production of interleukin 3 , 1985, European journal of immunology.

[29]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Cyclosporin A inhibits T-cell growth factor gene expression at the level of mRNA transcription. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Vilček,et al.  Gamma interferon synthesis by human thymocytes and T lymphocytes inhibited by cyclosporin A. , 1983, Science.

[31]  J. Fries,et al.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. , 1982, The Journal of rheumatology.

[32]  O. Steinbrocker,et al.  Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.