Mutant p53 promotes tumor progression and metastasis by the endoplasmic reticulum UDPase ENTPD5

Significance p53 mutations are the most frequent genetic alteration in cancer and are often indicative of poor patient survival prognosis. The most prevalent missense mutations lead to a “gain of function” (GOF) that actively drives tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Our study links the mutant p53 (mutp53) GOF to enhanced N-glycoprotein folding via ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 5 (ENTPD5) in the calnexin/calreticulin cycle of the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutp53 thus increases expression of prometastatic cell surface proteins, such as receptors and integrins, not only quantitatively but also qualitatively, with respect to N-glycosylation state. Our study reveals N-glycoprotein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum as an indispensable mechanism underlying the progression of tumors with GOF mutp53 that could provide new possibilities for treating prognostically challenging p53-mutated cancers. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most frequent genetic alteration in cancer and are often associated with progression from benign to invasive stages with metastatic potential. Mutations inactivate tumor suppression by p53, and some endow the protein with novel gain of function (GOF) properties that actively promote tumor progression and metastasis. By comparative gene expression profiling of p53-mutated and p53-depleted cancer cells, we identified ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 5 (ENTPD5) as a mutant p53 target gene, which functions as a uridine 5′-diphosphatase (UDPase) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to promote the folding of N-glycosylated membrane proteins. A comprehensive pan-cancer analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between p53 GOF mutations and ENTPD5 expression. Mechanistically, mutp53 is recruited by Sp1 to the ENTPD5 core promoter to induce its expression. We show ENTPD5 to be a mediator of mutant p53 GOF activity in clonogenic growth, architectural tissue remodeling, migration, invasion, and lung colonization in an experimental metastasis mouse model. Our study reveals folding of N-glycosylated membrane proteins in the ER as a mechanism underlying the metastatic progression of tumors with mutp53 that could provide new possibilities for cancer treatment.

[1]  S. Lowe,et al.  Cancer: Mutant p53 and chromatin regulation , 2015, Nature.

[2]  William J. Israelsen,et al.  ATP Consumption Promotes Cancer Metabolism , 2010, Cell.

[3]  Antonio Rosato,et al.  A Mutant-p53/Smad Complex Opposes p63 to Empower TGFβ-Induced Metastasis , 2009, Cell.

[4]  J. Norman,et al.  Mutant p53 Drives Invasion by Promoting Integrin Recycling , 2009, Cell.

[5]  S. Grossman,et al.  Addiction of lung cancer cells to GOF p53 is promoted by up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor through multiple contacts with p53 transactivation domain and promoter , 2016, Oncotarget.

[6]  V. Rotter,et al.  Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[7]  Karen H. Vousden,et al.  Mutant p53 in Cancer: New Functions and Therapeutic Opportunities , 2014, Cancer cell.

[8]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Integrin β1-focal adhesion kinase signaling directs the proliferation of metastatic cancer cells disseminated in the lungs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Mutant p53 cooperates with the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex to regulate VEGFR2 in breast cancer cells , 2015, Genes & development.

[10]  M. Hollstein,et al.  p53 gain-of-function cancer mutants induce genetic instability by inactivating ATM , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  Yide Mei,et al.  Mutant p53-R273H gains new function in sustained activation of EGFR signaling via suppressing miR-27a expression , 2013, Cell Death and Disease.

[12]  T. Fehm,et al.  A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Carol Prives,et al.  Mutant p53: one name, many proteins. , 2012, Genes & development.

[14]  J. Norman,et al.  Mutant p53 enhances MET trafficking and signalling to drive cell scattering and invasion , 2012, Oncogene.

[15]  Jianmin Wu,et al.  Mutant p53 Drives Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis through Cell-Autonomous PDGF Receptor β Signaling , 2014, Cell.

[16]  Milind B. Suraokar,et al.  TAp63 suppresses metastasis through coordinate regulation of Dicer and miRNAs , 2010, Nature.

[17]  T. Yoneda,et al.  Endoglin expression in metastatic breast cancer cells enhances their invasive phenotype , 2008, Oncogene.

[18]  Marco Mernberger,et al.  Characterization of the p53 Cistrome – DNA Binding Cooperativity Dissects p53's Tumor Suppressor Functions , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[19]  S. Giraud,et al.  Functional analysis of endoglin mutations from hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1 patients reveals different mechanisms for endoglin loss of function. , 2015, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  W. B. Derry Faculty Opinions recommendation of A Mutant-p53/Smad complex opposes p63 to empower TGFbeta-induced metastasis. , 2009 .

[21]  U. Moll,et al.  Two hot spot mutant p53 mouse models display differential gain of function in tumorigenesis , 2013, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[22]  A. Helenius,et al.  Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  O. Timofeev,et al.  Monitoring the dynamics of clonal tumour evolution in vivo using secreted luciferases , 2014, Nature Communications.

[24]  Wensheng Yan,et al.  Identification of GRO1 as a Critical Determinant for Mutant p53 Gain of Function* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  J. Kramer,et al.  Ectonucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase Type 5 (Entpd5)-Deficient Mice Develop Progressive Hepatopathy, Hepatocellular Tumors, and Spermatogenic Arrest , 2009, Veterinary pathology.

[26]  J. Chuang,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by p53 , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Varda Rotter,et al.  When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[28]  Paul Timpson,et al.  Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Prives,et al.  A Subset of Tumor-Derived Mutant Forms of p53 Down-Regulate p63 and p73 through a Direct Interaction with the p53 Core Domain , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  A. Levine,et al.  Mutant p53 Disrupts Mammary Tissue Architecture via the Mevalonate Pathway , 2012, Cell.

[31]  Ming K. Lee,et al.  Cell-type, dose, and mutation-type specificity dictate mutant p53 functions in vivo. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[32]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  A Designed Inhibitor of p53 Aggregation Rescues p53 Tumor Suppression in Ovarian Carcinomas. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[33]  T. Ohtsuka,et al.  Migratory activity of CD105+ pancreatic cancer cells is strongly enhanced by pancreatic stellate cells. , 2013, Pancreas.

[34]  D. Proia,et al.  Improving survival by exploiting tumor dependence on stabilized mutant p53 for treatment , 2015, Nature.

[35]  David P. Lane,et al.  Translating p53 into the clinic , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Tak W. Mak,et al.  The ER UDPase ENTPD5 Promotes Protein N-Glycosylation, the Warburg Effect, and Proliferation in the PTEN Pathway , 2010, Cell.

[37]  A. El‐Naggar,et al.  p53-mediated senescence impairs the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in breast cancer. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[38]  I. Fidler,et al.  The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[39]  J. Dennis,et al.  Complex N-Glycan Number and Degree of Branching Cooperate to Regulate Cell Proliferation and Differentiation , 2007, Cell.

[40]  J. Norman,et al.  Mutant p53 Regulates Dicer through p63-dependent and -independent Mechanisms to Promote an Invasive Phenotype* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  T. Jacks,et al.  Mutant p53 Gain of Function in Two Mouse Models of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome , 2004, Cell.

[42]  L. Strong,et al.  Gain of Function of a p53 Hot Spot Mutation in a Mouse Model of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome , 2004, Cell.

[43]  L. Strong,et al.  Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. , 1990, Science.

[44]  L. Donehower,et al.  Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours , 1992, Nature.

[45]  Antonio Rosato,et al.  A Pin1/mutant p53 axis promotes aggressiveness in breast cancer. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[46]  Y. Haupt,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Gain-of-function p53 mutants co-opt chromatin pathways to drive cancer growth. , 2015 .

[47]  I. Simon,et al.  Modulation of the vitamin D3 response by cancer-associated mutant p53. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[48]  A. Yang,et al.  Tumor predisposition in mice mutant for p63 and p73: evidence for broader tumor suppressor functions for the p53 family. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[49]  J. Grosshans,et al.  Positive feedback between Dia1, LARG, and RhoA regulates cell morphology and invasion. , 2007, Genes & development.

[50]  L. Al-Gazali,et al.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control Is Involved in the Mechanism of Endoglin-Mediated Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  W. Herr,et al.  Ethidium bromide provides a simple tool for identifying genuine DNA-independent protein associations. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.