Influence of irregularities in the electrolyte on the cathodic protection of steel: A numerical and experimental study

This paper shows how the last algebraic matricial form can be obtained when the finite element method is used to approximate the potential distribution of a cathodic protection system that includes low conductivity irregularities in the electrolyte away from, close to and directly on the cathode. In order to study the influence of the resistivity of these irregularities on the possibilities of steel protection, five conductivities were analysed. The numerical results, validated with COMSOL® Multiphysics, show the importance of considering irregularities in the domain in order to prevent systems from becoming unprotected. The experimental data agrees with the theoretical data.

[1]  Juan Carlos Galván,et al.  Title: Using the right side of Poisson's equation to save on numerical calculations in FEM simulation of electrochemical systems , 2011 .

[2]  O. F. Devereux,et al.  Numerical Modeling and Solution of Galvanic Corrosion Systems: Part II. Finite-Element Formulation and Descriptive Examples , 1991 .

[3]  J. A. González.  2007 F.N. Speller Award Lecture: Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Structure Durability by Electrochemical Techniques , 2007 .

[4]  Mohammad Habibi Parsa,et al.  Simulation of cathodic protection potential distributions on oil well casings , 2010 .

[5]  P. Mangat,et al.  Influence of resistivity on current and potential distribution of cathodic protection systems for steel framed masonry structures , 2008 .

[6]  Andrej Atrens,et al.  Boundary element method predictions of the influence of the electrolyte on the galvanic corrosion of AZ91D coupled to steel , 2005 .

[7]  J. Bushman,et al.  Technical Review of 100 mV Polarization Shift Criterion for Reinforcing Steel in Concrete , 1991 .

[8]  D. W. Townley,et al.  A boundary element model of cathodic well casing protection , 1993 .

[9]  K. Amaya,et al.  Effective boundary element methods in corrosion analysis , 2003 .

[10]  B. Reddy,et al.  Introductory Functional Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  Rd Strømmen.  Computer Modeling of Offshore Cathodic Protection Systems: Method and Experience , 1992 .

[12]  Johan Deconinck,et al.  A Numerical Model for Cathodic Protection of Buried Pipes , 1994 .

[13]  R. M. Degerstedt,et al.  Mathematical Models for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline with Coating Holidays: Part 2 Case Studies of Parallel Anode Cathodic Protection Systems underground pipelines by parallel-ribbon anodes. , 1997 .

[14]  R. Kasper,et al.  Electrogalvanic Finite Element Analysis of Partially Protected Marine Structures , 1983 .

[15]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Throwing power of cathodic prevention applied by means of sacrificial anodes to partially submerged marine reinforced concrete piles: Results of numerical simulations , 2009 .

[16]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Qualitative model of concrete acidification due to cathodic protection , 2008 .

[17]  R. M. Degerstedt,et al.  Mathematical Models for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline with Coating Holidays: Part 1 — Theoretical Development , 1995 .

[18]  M. Raupach,et al.  Protection of the opposite reinforcement layer of RC‐structures by CP – results of numerical simulations , 2010 .

[19]  José Herskovits,et al.  Shape optimization using the boundary element method and a SAND interior point algorithm for constrained optimization , 2008 .

[20]  C. L. Page,et al.  A two-dimensional model of electrochemical chloride removal from concrete , 2001 .

[21]  J. Genesca,et al.  Mathematical simulation of a cathodic protection system by finite element method , 2005 .

[22]  W. Aperador,et al.  Influence of conductivity on cathodic protection of reinforced alkali-activated slag mortar using the finite element method , 2009 .

[23]  V. G. DeGiorgi,et al.  Geometric details and modeling accuracy requirements for shipboard impressed current cathodic protection system modeling , 2005 .