Extended Producer Responsibility in Cleaner Production: Policy Principle to Promote Environmental Improvements of Product Systems

The focus of the environmental policy-making has shifted noticeably during the last decade. From having played a fairly insignificant role in the 1980s and earlier, product-related environmental problems have attracted an ever-increasing interest from policy-makers, especially in industrialised countries in North-Western Europe. Considerable attention has been devoted to the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) and today this concept is spread to most OECD countries and also outside this group of countries. This dissertation shows how the concept was developed, presents a model for various types of responsibilities and defines the EPR concept as a policy principle for environmental improvements of products and product systems. Experiences from existing EPR systems are studied and complemented with an analysis of proposed system implementations. The results are combined with a model for how an EPR system can be developed in order to give the incentives for change to the relevant actors. Conclusions concerning how the details of EPR systems should be organised are presented, as well as a discussion about the advantages and disadvantages with involving various actors in the policy development process and the role of these actors in the implementation of the system.

[1]  Desta Mebratu,et al.  Strategy framework for sustainable industrial development in sub-Saharan Africa: Systems-evolutionary approach , 2000 .

[2]  Wendy Kerr Remanufacturing and eco-efficiency: A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia , 2000 .

[3]  楠本 渉 Cleaner Production , 1998 .

[4]  Chris Ryan,et al.  Moving Beyond the Low‐Hanging Fruit in DfE , 1997 .

[5]  William Thorpe,et al.  Strategies to promote clean production: Extended Producer Responsibility , 1997 .

[6]  A. Bruvoll,et al.  The costs of alternative policies for paper and plastic waste , 1998 .

[7]  Bette K. Fishbein,et al.  Germany, Garbage, and the Green Dot: Challenging the Throwaway Society , 1994 .

[8]  F. den Hond,et al.  The similarity and heterogeneity theses in studying innovation: Evidence from the end-of-vehicle case , 1998 .

[9]  Molly Harriss Olson The US President's Council On Sustainable Development , 1996 .

[10]  Lars Hansson The Internalization of External Effects in Swedish Transport Policy - A Comparison Between Road and Rail Traffic , 1997 .

[11]  Naoko Tojo,et al.  Analysis of EPR Policies and Legislation through omparative study of selected EPR programmes for EEE-Based on the in-depth study of a Japanese EPR regulation , 2000 .

[12]  Shuk-wai Freda Fung Handling the municipal solid waste in China: case study of policies for ‘White Pollution’ in Beijing , 2000 .

[13]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[14]  Alexandra Kielkiewicz-Young Packaging and packaging waste policy in Poland: Case study of containers for beer and soft drinks , 2000 .

[15]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Government Strategies and Policies for Cleaner Production , 1994 .

[16]  Gary A. Davis Books: Extended Producer Responsibility in the OECD Area: Legal and Administrative Approaches in Member Countries and Policy Options for EPR Programmes , 1997 .

[17]  P Arnfalk INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN POLLUTION PREVENTION: TELECONFERENCING AND TELEWORK USED AS TOOLS IN THE REDUCTION OF WORK RELATED TRAVEL , 1999 .