Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination

Abstract The article examines the usage of the “major constituent” concept in theories of coordination. The literature on coordination references major constituents when predicting the material that may and may not be shared by the conjuncts of coordinate structures. Previous attempts at defining the concept are, however, vague and insufficient. Hence the article presents a new definition. This definition is based in a dependency grammar framework. In addition to this new definition, two constraints are proposed that help predict which material can be shared in coordination. The first constraint, called the Restriction on External Sharing (RES) predicts which material external to coordinate structures can be shared. The second constraint, called the Restriction on Internal Sharing (RIS), predicts which material internal to the initial conjunct can be shared. A central aspect of the approach is the distinction between conjunct-external and conjunct-internal sharing. Various data are examined that demonstrate the validity of this distinction.

[1]  Linda Schwartz,et al.  The syntax of coordination , 1990 .

[2]  Chris Wilder,et al.  Some Properties of Ellipsis in Coordination , 1997 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[4]  D. J. Allerton,et al.  Essentials of grammatical theory: A consensus view of syntax and morphology , 1979 .

[5]  D. G. Hays Dependency Theory: A Formalism and Some Observations , 1964 .

[6]  A. Barss,et al.  A note on anaphora and double objects , 1986 .

[7]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[8]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Coordination and grammatical relations , 1988, Journal of Linguistics.

[9]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach , 1997 .

[10]  A. Carnie Syntax: A Generative Introduction , 2002 .

[11]  John Robert Ross,et al.  GAPPING AND THE ORDER OF CONSTITUENTS , 1970 .

[12]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Gapping and grammatical relations , 1989, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Anna Hildegard Neijt-kappen Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar , 1980 .

[14]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[15]  Lucien Tesnière Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .

[16]  Peter A. Machonis Syntax of Idioms , 2004 .

[17]  Michael Brody Towards an Elegant Syntax , 2003 .

[18]  Timothy Osborne Beyond the Constituent - A Dependency Grammar Analysis of Chains , 2006 .

[19]  R. Hudson,et al.  Constituency and dependency , 1980 .

[20]  Richard Hudson,et al.  English word grammar , 1995 .

[21]  Ulrich Engel Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache , 1996 .

[22]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure , 1981 .

[23]  William O'grady,et al.  The Syntax of Idioms , 1998 .

[24]  C. Phillips Linear Order and Constituency , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[25]  Peter Peterson,et al.  Coordination: Consequences of a Lexical-Functional Account , 2004 .

[26]  R. Jackendoff On Larson's treatment of the double object construction , 1990 .

[27]  Donna Jo Napoli Syntax: Theory and Problems , 1993 .

[28]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Coordination and how to distinguish categories , 1985 .

[29]  R. Larson Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff , 1990 .

[30]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[31]  Andrew Barss,et al.  A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects 1986 , 1989 .

[32]  Wha-Young Jung Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenzgrammatik , 1995 .

[33]  David R. Dowty Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction , 1988 .

[34]  J. Johannessen Partial agreement and coordination , 1996 .

[35]  M. Pickering,et al.  Dependency categorial grammar and coordination , 1993 .

[36]  Alan Munn Three Types of Coordination Asymmetries , 2000 .

[37]  Gerhard Helbig,et al.  Deutsche Grammatik : ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht , 2001 .