Real-time or faster-than-real-time simulation of airflow in buildings.

UNLABELLED Real-time flow simulation is crucial for emergency management in buildings, such as fire and accidental or intentional release of chemical/biological agents (contaminants). The simulation results can then be used to impose proper measures to minimize casualties. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is accurate, but too time-consuming. Nodal models are fast, but not informative. To obtain a quick and informative solution, this study proposes an intermediate approach between nodal models and CFD by introducing a fast fluid dynamics (FFD) method. This investigation used the FFD methods with and without turbulence treatments to study systematically four basic flows in buildings, and compared the numerical results with the corresponding CFD results and the data from the literature. The results show that, on one hand, the FFD can offer much richer flow information than nodal models, but less accurate results than CFD. On the other hand, the FFD is 50 times faster than the CFD. The results also show that the FFD with the laminar assumption has the best overall performance as regards both accuracy and speed. It is possible to conduct faster-than-real-time flow simulations with detailed flow information by using the FFD method. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The paper introduces a fast fluid dynamics (FFD) method, which can simulate airflow and contaminant dispersion in buildings with real-time or faster-than-real-time speed and provide informative solutions. As an intermediate approach between nodal models and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the FFD can be a very useful tool for emergency management in case of fire and accidental or intentional release of chemical or biological agents in a building or around the buildings. The FFD can also be used as a preliminary test tool for quick assessment of indoor airflows before a detailed CFD analysis.

[1]  R. Courant,et al.  On the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations by finite differences , 1952 .

[2]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Liangzhu.  ANALYSIS ON THE WELL-MIXING ASSUMPTIONS USED IN MULTIZONE AIRFLOW NETWORK MODELS , 2007 .

[4]  Clayton T. Crowe,et al.  Numerical models for two-phase turbulent flows , 1996 .

[5]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS FOR INDOOR ENVIRONMENT MODELING: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2007 .

[6]  Zhiqiang John Zhai,et al.  Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature , 2007 .

[7]  Qingyan Chen.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT k-ε MODELS FOR INDOOR AIR FLOW COMPUTATIONS , 1995 .

[8]  James W. Axley,et al.  Multizone Airflow Modeling in Buildings: History and Theory , 2007 .

[9]  Liangzhu Wang,et al.  Evaluation of some assumptions used in multizone airflow network models , 2008 .

[10]  A. Restivo,et al.  Turbulent flow in ventilated rooms , 1979 .

[11]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  A zero-equation turbulence model for indoor airflow simulation , 1998 .

[12]  A. Chorin.  A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems , 1997 .

[13]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  R. Courant,et al.  Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik , 1928 .

[15]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and 1 Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD : Part-1 : 2 Summary of Prevalent Turbulence Models 3 4 , 2007 .

[16]  Liu You,et al.  Real-Time 3D Fluid Simulation on GPU with Complex Obstacles , 2006 .

[17]  P. L. Betts,et al.  Experiments on turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity , 2000 .

[18]  Carlos Eduardo Scheidegger,et al.  Practical CFD Simulations on Programmable Graphics Hardware using SMAC † , 2005, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  P V Nielsen,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics and room air movement. , 2004, Indoor air.

[20]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Zonal Modeling for Simulating Indoor Environment of Buildings: Review, Recent Developments, and Applications , 2007 .

[21]  Mark J. Harris.  Real-time cloud simulation and rendering , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[22]  Jos Stam,et al.  Stable fluids , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[23]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Visual simulation of smoke , 2001, SIGGRAPH.