Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.

Users of a cochlear implant together with a contralateral hearing aid-so-called bimodal listeners-have difficulties with localizing sound sources. This is mainly due to the distortion of interaural time and level difference cues (ITD and ILD), and limited ITD sensitivity. An algorithm is presented that enhances ILD cues. Horizontal plane sound-source localization performance of six bimodal listeners was evaluated in (1) a real sound field with their clinical devices, (2) in a virtual sound field, under direct computer control, and (3) in a virtual sound field with ILD enhancement. The results in the real sound field did not differ significantly from the results in the virtual field, and ILD enhancement improved localization performance by 4°-10° absolute error, relative to a mean absolute error of 28° in the condition without ILD enhancement.

[1]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Localization of High‐Frequency Tones , 1957 .

[2]  H. Dillon,et al.  Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[3]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E. Shaw.  Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Moore.  An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.). , 1989 .

[8]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[10]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity of Bimodal Listeners to Interaural Time Differences with Modulated Single- and Multiple-Channel Stimuli , 2010, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  Colette M McKay,et al.  A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[13]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Teresa Y. C. Ching,et al.  Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[17]  Jan Wouters,et al.  APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  W. Yost,et al.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Localization by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With a Single Cochlear Implant , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  Tom Francart.  Perception of Binaural Localization Cues with Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (Perceptie van binaurale lokalisatiecues met gecombineerd elektrisch en akoestisch gehoor) , 2008 .

[21]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[24]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level Difference and Loudness Growth with Bilateral Bimodal Stimulation , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[25]  B. Moore,et al.  Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. , 2010, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[26]  A D Musicant,et al.  The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  F L Wightman,et al.  Monaural sound localization revisited. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.