Toward a theory of managing context in Six Sigma process-improvement projects: An action research investigation

Abstract In this paper, field studies, extant literature, and domain knowledge are used to develop a theory of managing context in Six Sigma process-improvement projects. By means of a participatory action research investigation involving ten projects in manufacturing and service firms, this paper examines the interrelationship among project context, elements, and success. Rich text-based information for each project was analyzed for the underlying patterns and relationships using the NVIVO 8 qualitative data analysis software package. The insights gained from this in-depth field investigation are presented in the form of 12 inductively derived research propositions that, when taken together, uniquely contribute to context-based theory-building in this area.

[1]  C. Argyris.  Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational , 1982 .

[2]  Xingxing Zu,et al.  The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma , 2008 .

[3]  L. Bourgeois.  STRATEGIC GOALS, PERCEIVED UNCERTAINTY, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN VOLATILE ENVIRONMENTS , 1985 .

[4]  Eva Maaninen-Olsson,et al.  Deviations, Ambiguity and Uncertainty in a Project-Intensive Organization , 2005 .

[5]  Kevin W. Linderman,et al.  Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[8]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[9]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[10]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[11]  R. Riley,et al.  Revealing Socially Constructed Knowledge Through Quasi-Structured Interviews and Grounded Theory Analysis , 1996 .

[12]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[13]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[14]  Marianne McCarthy,et al.  Dimensional Analysis: Broadening the Conception of Grounded Theory , 1996 .

[15]  B. N. Baker,et al.  Determinants of project success , 1974 .

[16]  Chris Chapman,et al.  Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management , 2003 .

[17]  Satya S. Chakravorty.  Where Process-Improvement Projects Go Wrong , 2010 .

[18]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective , 2000 .

[19]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams , 2006 .

[21]  Robert J. Might,et al.  The role of structural factors in determining project management success , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  G. Johns.  The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[23]  Alex Pavlak.  Project Troubleshooting: Tiger Teams for Reactive Risk Management , 2004 .

[24]  J. Pfeffer.  Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[25]  E. Schein.  The clinical perspective in fieldwork , 1987 .

[26]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory , 2008 .

[27]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  Candice L Schachter,et al.  The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[29]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Moya Morison PhD BSc MSc Ba Rgn,et al.  The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse? , 2002 .

[31]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Factors Influencing Innovation Success at the Project Level , 1976 .

[32]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach , 2002 .

[33]  Robert T. Golembiewski,et al.  Handbook of organizational consultation , 1993 .

[34]  Lyn Richards,et al.  From filing cabinet to computer , 1994 .

[35]  R. McAdam,et al.  A multilevel case study critique of six sigma: statistical control or strategic change? , 2004 .

[36]  Svetlana Cicmil.  Chapter 8 – Reflection, participation and learning in project environments: a multiple perspective agenda , 2005 .

[37]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Neo-Industrial Organising: Renewal by Action and Knowledge Formation in a Project-intensive Economy , 1999 .

[38]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[39]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[40]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management , 2007 .

[41]  M Morison,et al.  The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse? , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[42]  Richard Schroeder,et al.  Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations , 1999 .

[43]  Thomas J. Peters.  Symbols, patterns, and settings: An optimistic case for getting things done , 1978 .

[44]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective , 2003 .

[45]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[46]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Clinical Inquiry/Research , 2008 .

[47]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[48]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[49]  E. Schein.  Process consultation revisited : building the helping relationship , 1999 .

[50]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[51]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[52]  Christina Goulding.  Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers , 2002 .

[53]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[55]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[56]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.