Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article was to compare the performance of digital mammography using hardcopy image reading against film-screen mammography in a French national routine population-based screening program with a decentralized organization. The French context offered the opportunity to examine separately computed radiography and direct digital mammography performances in a large cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study includes 23,423 direct digital mammography, 73,320 computed radiography, and 65,514 film-screen mammography examinations performed by 123 facilities in Bouches du Rhône, France, for women 50-74 years old between 2008 and 2010. We compared abnormal mammography findings rate, cancer detection rate, and tumor characteristics among the technologies. RESULTS Abnormal finding rates were higher for direct digital mammography (7.78% vs 6.11% for film-screen mammography and 5.34% for computed radiography), particularly in younger women and in denser breasts. Cancer detection rates were also higher for direct digital mammography (0.71% vs 0.66% for film-screen mammography and 0.55% for computed radiography). The contrast between detection rates was stronger for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast density was the main factor explaining the differences in detection rates. For direct digital mammography only, the detection rate was clearly higher in dense breasts whatever the age (odds ratio, 2.20). Except for grade, no differences were recorded concerning tumor characteristics in which the proportion of high-grade tumors was larger for direct digital mammography for invasive and in situ tumors. CONCLUSION Direct digital mammography has a higher detection rate than film-screen mammography in dense breasts and for tumors of high grade. This latter association warrants further study to measure the impact of technology on efficacy of screening. The data indicate that computed radiography detects fewer tumors than film-screen mammography in most instances.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.

[2]  M. Pamilo,et al.  Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[3]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[4]  W. Heindel,et al.  Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers? , 2010, Radiology.

[5]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  Boel Heddson,et al.  Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[8]  P. Skaane Digital Mammography in European Population-Based Screening Programs , 2010 .

[9]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. , 2005, Breast.

[11]  R. Ancelle-Park,et al.  [Breast cancer screening: are results of French and international programmes comparable?]. , 2006, Journal de radiologie.

[12]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography? , 2010, European Radiology.

[13]  S. Duffy,et al.  The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit , 2011, European Radiology.

[14]  J. Estève,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy and screening mammography: analysis of the results in the Bouches du Rhône programme , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[15]  P. Skaane,et al.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.

[16]  G. Marchal,et al.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen–film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  P. Skaane Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[18]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates , 2010, European Radiology.

[21]  X. Castells,et al.  Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. , 2011, Radiology.

[22]  Niall Phelan,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  F. Flanagan,et al.  Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[25]  Sarah Vinnicombe,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. , 2009, Radiology.

[26]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. , 2008, Radiology.

[27]  P. Skaane,et al.  Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study , 2007, European Radiology.

[28]  C. Lehman,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  B. Séradour,et al.  Dépistage organisé des Cancers du Sein : peut-on comparer les résultats du programme français aux résultats internationaux ? , 2006 .

[30]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. , 2012, Radiology.