Distinctiveness of spoken word context predicts visual lexical decision time

We review various dimensions along which words differ and which, sometimes as part of a word recognition model, have been claimed to predict performance in the visual lexical decision task. Models of word recognition have typically involved inadequate, or non-existent, semantic representations and have dealt with words existing in isolation from any context. We propose an alternative perspective in which it is the relationships between words reflecting usage and meaning rather than the discrete entities themselves, that are fundamental to lexical processing. We present Contextual Distinctiveness (CD), a corpus-derived measure of the plurality of the different content-word contexts in which a word occurs in speech, and demonstrate that it is a significant predictor of response times in a simple visual lexical decision task. We argue that LDT effects previously attributed to Age of Acquisition and word frequency should be reinterpreted in terms of CD. As well as subsuming a number of other lexical variables, we detail further advantages of CD, in terms of computational tractability, objectivity, relation to real language, and relation to formal linguistics.

[1]  J. Jastrzembski Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition and residence time in lexical memory as factors in word naming , 1984 .

[3]  R. Shillcock,et al.  The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[5]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[6]  R. Shillcock,et al.  The role of phonotactic range in the order of acquisition of English consonants , 1997 .

[7]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[8]  A. Ross Structural Linguistics , 1953, Nature.

[9]  M. Gernsbacher Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Christopher C. Huckle Unsupervised categorization of word meanings using statistical and neural network methods , 1996 .

[11]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990, Neurocomputing.

[12]  D. Ingram The Acquisition Of Word-Initial [v] , 1988, Language and speech.

[13]  C. P. Whaley Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[14]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[15]  C. T. James The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[17]  C. A. Becker Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Modularity and the processing of closed-class words , 1993 .

[19]  M. Taft Lexical processing of functionally constrained words , 1990 .

[20]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[21]  Peter E. Morr Age of acquisition, imagery, recall, and the limitations of multiple-regression analysis , 1981 .

[22]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[23]  A. Giovagnoli Connectionist modelling in cognitive neuropsychology: A case study , 1995, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[24]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings , 1980 .

[25]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[26]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  D. Davidson Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation , 1984 .

[28]  Pascale Fung,et al.  Compiling Bilingual Lexicon Entries From a Non-Parallel English-Chinese Corpus , 1995, VLC@ACL.

[29]  David C. Rubin,et al.  51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior , 1980 .

[30]  D. Bradley,et al.  Computational distinctions of vocabulary type , 1978 .

[31]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Statistical language learning , 1997 .

[32]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition and lexical decision making ☆ , 1982 .

[33]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[34]  M. Westphal Holism: A Shopper’s Guide , 1993 .

[35]  S. Hains,et al.  Individual differences in word recognition latency , 1979 .

[36]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[37]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Morphological families in the internal lexicon , 1989 .

[38]  J. K. Voice Competition processes in visual word recognition , 1996 .

[39]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Computational dissociation of two vocabulary types: Evidence from aphasia , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[41]  Gregory V. Jones Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication , 1985, Brain and Language.

[42]  A. Cutler Phonological cues to open- and closed-class words in the processing of spoken sentences , 1993, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[43]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Developmental and acquired dyslexia: A comparison , 1982, Cognition.