Old or new occupants of energy rehabilitated buildings. Two different approaches for hierarchizing group of buildings

Abstract Public Administrations are frequently entitled to intervene in building stocks with energy rehabilitation actions. Unfortunately, the monetary budget at their disposal is generally limited and, consequently, a prioritization criterion is needed to optimize its allocation. The classification of the building energy performance is increasingly used by Public Administrations for this purpose. Here we argue that a proper prioritization criterion should depend upon the potential subjects to which the rehabilitated buildings are given back. If the energy rehabilitation is conducted on buildings that will be assigned to new dwellers, it would be preferable to use the energy class – which is based on a standardized energy consumption – because a change of the building users will occur with a consequent plausible change of the building energy usage profile. Instead, if same dwellers will occupy the retrofitted building, a criterion based on a usage profile – that is actually the one established by these occupants – seems to be more appropriate. The priority orders of 23 buildings of the Sicilian stock, obtained using their energy class and real energy consumption, are presented and compared. Results show at which extent these two rankings differ, thus warning Public Administrations about prioritization criteria to adopt.

[1]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Understanding Occupants’ Behaviour for Energy Efficiency in Buildings , 2017 .

[2]  Marilena De Simone,et al.  Behavioral and Physical Factors Influencing Energy Building Performances in Mediterranean Climate , 2015 .

[3]  Martin Belusko,et al.  Comparing the energy performance of Australian houses using NatHERS modelling against measured household energy consumption for heating and cooling , 2016 .

[4]  Michael Hörner,et al.  Die Diskrepanz zwischen Energiebedarf und ‐verbrauch bei Nichtwohngebäuden – ein empirischer Ansatz , 2015 .

[5]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  A methodology for evaluating the potential energy savings of retrofitting residential building stocks , 2012 .

[6]  L. D. Danny Harvey,et al.  Reducing energy use in the buildings sector: measures, costs, and examples , 2009 .

[7]  Eleonora Riva Sanseverino,et al.  On the architectural and energy classification of existing buildings: A case study of a district in the city of Palermo , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC).

[8]  Cesare Biserni,et al.  Energy performance of an existing office building in the northern part of Italy: Retrofitting actions and economic assessment , 2016 .

[9]  Steve Goodhew,et al.  An investigation of the appropriateness of current methodologies for energy certification of Mediterranean housing , 2016 .

[10]  Thomas Bednar,et al.  Identification of the user Behavior Related Influence on the Estimated Energy Performance , 2015 .

[11]  Ian Paul Knight,et al.  Predicting Operational Energy Consumption Profiles - Findings from Detailed Surveys and Modelling in a UK Educational Building Compared to Measured Consumption , 2008 .

[12]  Giorgia Peri,et al.  On the classification of large residential buildings stocks by sample typologies for energy planning purposes , 2014 .

[13]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption , 2016 .

[14]  Guilherme Carrilho da Graça,et al.  Energy certification of existing office buildings: Analysis of two case studies and qualitative reflection , 2013 .

[15]  María Herrando,et al.  Energy Performance Certification of Faculty Buildings in Spain: The gap between estimated and real energy consumption , 2016 .